Title Edit: Some Peasant's Pathetic Attention Whoring.
- Thread starter igl00
- Start date
So basically you took content from Wicked Fire (CCarter), made it into a WSO over at WaFo.. And tried to profit?
I can't really see how spending time and energy creating threads like this is in any way beneficial to anyone.
Personally I don't mind, I've just worked out a way to cheat at being #1 in Google SERP every time (thank you algo updates), and for stupidly high comp keywords too. I'll share the experience with you all in the coming few months and when I do I don't expect credit for it, in much the same way the Roger waters couldn't give a shit about suing Andrew Lloyd Webber for clearly ripping off Pink Floyd.
You decide if it was plagiarised or not.
Oh - and the more astute & observant may have realised that I just told you it. In plain English.
Personally I don't mind, I've just worked out a way to cheat at being #1 in Google SERP every time (thank you algo updates), and for stupidly high comp keywords too. I'll share the experience with you all in the coming few months and when I do I don't expect credit for it, in much the same way the Roger waters couldn't give a shit about suing Andrew Lloyd Webber for clearly ripping off Pink Floyd.
You decide if it was plagiarised or not.
Oh - and the more astute & observant may have realised that I just told you it. In plain English.
I INVANTED ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ, SO BASICALLY WHEN YOU COMMUNICATE YOU ARE USING MY PATENT PENDING TECHNOLOGY. BETTER START SENDING ME MILLIONS.
did you profit from your e-book? If you did, what is the fucking problem? If you didn't, why are you posting worthless topics instead of getting to the money?
I'd just like to point out one major flaw in this ebook and CCarter's original post.
Blocking ahrefs and similar will fuck you over if you have negative SEO going on in your niche and you need to take note of the bad links.
Blocking ahrefs and similar will fuck you over if you have negative SEO going on in your niche and you need to take note of the bad links.
Yeah? Well fuck you :
.. / .. -. ...- . -. - . -.. / .-.. .. ..-. . / -.-- --- ..- / ..-. .- --. --. --- -
01011011010100000110111101110011011101000010000001110110011010010111001101101001011000100110110001100101001000000110111101101110011011000111100100100000011101000110111100100000010101110110100101100011011010110110010101100100011001100110100101110010011001010010000001010000011100100110010101101101011010010111010101101101001000000110110101100101011011010110001001100101011100100111001101011101
That's not a flaw, that's a feature.
But seriously, there are several side effects, that you would need to take in consideration, if your competition is blind, essentially you are too. Grindstone recently did a post about using yahoo, yes, yahoo to somehow get backlinks. Yes, Yahoo. yes motherfucker, Yahoo. http://www.wickedfire.com/traffic-content/168051-thanks.html
See. now this thread is productive.
That's not a flaw, that's a feature.
But seriously, there are several side effects, that you would need to take in consideration, if your competition is blind, essentially you are too. Grindstone recently did a post about using yahoo, yes, yahoo to somehow get backlinks. Yes, Yahoo. yes motherfucker, Yahoo. http://www.wickedfire.com/traffic-content/168051-thanks.html
See. now this thread is productive.
I think he might have meant to leave that quietly over in that thread only, but yes - 100% agree.
yes CCarter i had to make thread coz u were fuckin other threads with this bullshit. u could just PM me instead of sending poeasants. me liking ur old posts dont make me reading ur new ones nor stealing them?
i wont be going on venge in other threads, im closing this here from my side.
ok i wont post here anymore as i proven my point but to top this with a fatality, a small cherry on a cake:
whole Ccarter use of robots.txt is wrong
u shoukl use robots.txt the way i say in my ebook not the way CCarter posts states. free lesson from igl00.
CCarter tells you to block 353543 robots, making the file have 3534kbytes.
thats not how it works. u should use small robots.txt files i share with u in the ebook:
block few bots of ahrefs majestic etc or block all bots but allow google/yahoo/bing etc. both shared in my book, both not in ccarters post.
why? because making oversized robots.txt files will make sure some bots cycle trought this and eat lots of your BW for free.
CCarter also tells you to ddos somebody with .htaccess redirect of bots.
1. 95% bots are too smart to go after this redirect. they will either ignore it or think you just link to this site [think of some odd google bot that got messed up and this u 301 to comptitor?!]
2. if u actually ddosed somebody this way - its fully traceable to u. u go to jail bro.
REAL BLACKHAT THEORY: some crappy bots have line limit of robots.txt reading and some are crappy and keep cycling trought robots.txt files. you find somebody with this crazy oversized robots.txt file and keep posting it on places robots can find it. in no time a few shitty bots will be refreshing his big ass robos.txt file 24/7 wasting his bw for free.
eot from me. hope everybody had some fun.
merry xmas and happy new year!
i wont be going on venge in other threads, im closing this here from my side.
ok i wont post here anymore as i proven my point but to top this with a fatality, a small cherry on a cake:
whole Ccarter use of robots.txt is wrong
u shoukl use robots.txt the way i say in my ebook not the way CCarter posts states. free lesson from igl00.
CCarter tells you to block 353543 robots, making the file have 3534kbytes.
thats not how it works. u should use small robots.txt files i share with u in the ebook:
block few bots of ahrefs majestic etc or block all bots but allow google/yahoo/bing etc. both shared in my book, both not in ccarters post.
why? because making oversized robots.txt files will make sure some bots cycle trought this and eat lots of your BW for free.
CCarter also tells you to ddos somebody with .htaccess redirect of bots.
1. 95% bots are too smart to go after this redirect. they will either ignore it or think you just link to this site [think of some odd google bot that got messed up and this u 301 to comptitor?!]
2. if u actually ddosed somebody this way - its fully traceable to u. u go to jail bro.
REAL BLACKHAT THEORY: some crappy bots have line limit of robots.txt reading and some are crappy and keep cycling trought robots.txt files. you find somebody with this crazy oversized robots.txt file and keep posting it on places robots can find it. in no time a few shitty bots will be refreshing his big ass robos.txt file 24/7 wasting his bw for free.
eot from me. hope everybody had some fun.
merry xmas and happy new year!
I dont see why "who posted what information first" makes anyone in this thread a better man.
Igl00 and CCarter, both of you arguing in this thread is pathetic. Who gives a shit who posted what first?
BTW, the info is something neither of you invented or made up. People cloaking Google, Facebook, eBay bots, Amazon bots, etc have been doing this mainstream since like 2005 at least. one look in phpbay pro forums can provide dates years ahead of stuff like this. You guys just applied a few extra bots to it, Ahrefs and Majestic, etc.
I am not knocking your sharing of this info, but claiming who did this first is stupid considering this has been info available to the right webmasters for years now.
All I see is 2 people wasting time on figuring out who did what, instead of stacking more dollars.
Also, just using robots.txt is peasant anyways. You should have more then this if you wanna block bots. How about a hidden img link in your text that only a bot would find that is really a PHP script with just a .jpg extension? Snatch the useragent and IP and there you go...
Igl00 and CCarter, both of you arguing in this thread is pathetic. Who gives a shit who posted what first?
BTW, the info is something neither of you invented or made up. People cloaking Google, Facebook, eBay bots, Amazon bots, etc have been doing this mainstream since like 2005 at least. one look in phpbay pro forums can provide dates years ahead of stuff like this. You guys just applied a few extra bots to it, Ahrefs and Majestic, etc.
I am not knocking your sharing of this info, but claiming who did this first is stupid considering this has been info available to the right webmasters for years now.
All I see is 2 people wasting time on figuring out who did what, instead of stacking more dollars.
Also, just using robots.txt is peasant anyways. You should have more then this if you wanna block bots. How about a hidden img link in your text that only a bot would find that is really a PHP script with just a .jpg extension? Snatch the useragent and IP and there you go...
010010010010000001001001011011100111011001100101011011100111010001100101011001000010000001111010011001010111001001101111001000000110000101101110011001000010000001101111011011100110010100101100001000000111001101101111001000000110001001100101011101000111010001100101011100100010000001110000011000010111100100100000011011010110010100100000011001100110111101110010001000000111010001101000011000010111010000101110
