SEO Friendly Wikipedia Backlinks: The Ultimate Authority (GetWikipediaBacklink.com)

Status
Not open for further replies.

kingofthewiki

New member
Dec 6, 2014
203
3
0
Dark side of the moon
Rating - 100%
22   0   0
header_.jpg

SEO FRIENDLY WIKIPEDIA BACKLINKS

About the Service

I am very experienced with Wikipedia and I have an extremely reputed and trusted account with over 40,000 edits. I am a wikipedia editor and all my links are guaranteed for a minimum of 6 months and they will be on wikipedia. It takes much time and effort to get links on wikipedia, especially links that I guarantee for 6 months.

As you may know it is almost impossible to get links into Wikipedia without an extremely trusted and authoritative site and most links get deleted by moderators the next day! With my reputation, authority, and ability to stay under the radar in Wikipedia I am able to get stable long term links.

I will add a link to your site in Wikipedia, on an existing page related to your subject. I will pick the best page allowing for both a high chance of the link sticking as well as maximizing traffic to your site. There are a lot of moderators and editors watching all the content so everything I do has to be thoroughly planned out.

Even with the new regulations and guidelines (which I mention below) - I am still the most qualified person to place links/content on Wikipedia. Here are a few of the new regulations that make things even more difficult than they already are;

A. Detecting spam (better systems) - practically all edits that involve a link addition are reviewed now, whatever the account may be. Even older accounts get reviewed now!

B. More risk - I need to do a lot more preliminary work to ensure that sites do not get blacklisted, since they are more trigger happy with spam blacklists now.

C. Standards are being raised so having a respectable account means much more work and meaningful editing.

(That’s where you donation money goes!!)

about_1.jpg

Benefits & Stats

Fact #1 | Free Backlinks
Wikipedia is always being scraped/users are copying the content and pasting it on their own domains. This means that if you have a link on a wikipedia page that gets copied, then the more copies that page gets - the more backlinks you get. Nothing is better than having people do all the work for you for FREE!

Fact #2 | Traffic Benefits
Having a link in Wikipedia gives you large amounts of nonstop and extremely targeted traffic. Within a month you could easily make back your investment.

Fact #3 | SEO Benefits
I really can't claim anything for SEO benefits, it all comes down to your own knowledge. Ask yourself this, what is the purpose of a backlink? It shows authority and trust to search engines. What better authority and trust is there than having a link inside Wikipedia, where it is nearly impossible to get a crappy site in?

People keep saying - its a no follow link. Do you think Google wants to only see do follow links - do you think that looks natural? It is a no follow link, but its the BEST fukin no-follow link you can get. Here are the current stats. Numbers speak for themselves;

+ Domain Authority (DA) = 100
+ Google PR (keep in mind that hasnt been updated for a while) = 9
+ Ahrefs domain rank = 91
+ Alexa Rank = 7

stats_1.jpg

Refunds & Guarantee

Full refund or replacement is provided if a link is removed within 6 months.

I have done almost a thousands of links now, and all of the links I have done have stuck permanently. However, the standard guarantee and monitoring period I provide is 6 months, which is usually sufficient to guarantee that a link sticks. Check Get Wikipedia Backlink FAQ for frequently asked questions if you need to.

guarantee_1.jpg

Ordering

- Your website URL (Blog URL if different)
- Page you want a link to
- Preferred Wikipedia pages you want your link on. I can provide suggestions if you don’t have any!

Testimonials from the forum + iTrader Score

My sales thread was not open when I completed the work for a few clients, so they posted an iTrader review instead!


C9y0StB.jpg


Lza2dnK.png

XvnXUlk.png

nfTSWrm.png

0rnBpnz.png

VSrEaIL.png



Contact

PM me! | Skype = editor.wikipedia | Email = editor@getwikipediabacklink.com
I will try to respond as soon as possible.

Cost

This price is only for Wicked Fire Members. Price usually varies (A lot) depending on niche, but I have decided to MAX OUT the price at $218. That means, no one will pay more than $218 for a link - no matter how difficult the niche is. This is a one-time fee for all the preliminary research + link placement and activation.


Previous threads incase you want to check them out! - 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
 
Last edited:


I am seeing a lot of new providers showing up for Wikipedia and some clients getting ripped off so I want to post this to explain some differentiators between us and some of our competitors.

- We are a team of 3 Wikipedia editors and have super admin accounts (those took 8 - 9 years in the making having between 90k to 140k edits on each of those accounts) so they are very respected accounts. We all use our accounts on daily basis and get instant notifications if anything changes on our work! Other providers open an account for each link and then forget about it, which means your links are just left to rot and sooner or later accounts with 1 - 2 edits will be reviewed and shut down completely.

- Our work is 100% white hat. There is no dead link method linking or buying expired domains or whatever other black hat methods other providers use. Everything goes through the right process and moderation processes so its incredibly hard for some one to delete your links without having a legitimate reason of doing so. They will get hammered with negative feedback and get questioned about their knowledge on Wikipedia. (Remember we are 3 super admin wikipedia editors doing this! - can't fuck with us)

- Our work is guaranteed for 6 months and not 2 or 3 months like other competitors.

- We offer a REFUND or a REPLACEMENT link if anything happens to your link/our work. Other providers will not provide a refund and will replace your link with a new one which is not a best practice in every case, since some sites are flagged when they are removed which makes it even harder to get links back on Wikipedia again.

- We don't over promise and over deliver. Here are some examples;

1. Some will claim that they can get you a page on Wikipedia, whatever your business is. This is true but your page will not last more than a month before getting removed and goodluck getting back on there. Once your site or page is flagged or removed it becomes harder to get it back on Wikipedia since everything there has a record.

2. Others will claim that they can get any site such as facebook, youtube, twitter, blogger or other properties on Wikipedia. I hope they try so that I can close their accounts down. lol. This is impossible and you will def be losing money if you try doing this.

- We know all the monitoring tools and tactics used to prevent spam on Wikipedia. We have access to those tools.. and we do preliminary research before creating or adding links on Wikipedia. Our super admin accounts show us everything about your site/target pages and likely hood of sticking. This is because everything on Wikipedia is recorded (literally everything has a record) and there are built in tools (both internally built by Wikipedians and externally built by other devs to help with mass edits, etc..)

- Everything we do is done manually and with the highest quality possible. There are no magic tools that will automatically place your links on Wikipedia. We are based in the U.S and we are all native english speakers.

- Last but not least our pricing is very reasonable when compared to other overseas providers and we are always working on dropping it. If you choose our service you are paying for the highest quality work possible on Wikipedia.

- We are transparent in everything we do (to a limit off-course) and would be happy to answer any questions or requests so hit me up if you have any. I hope this helps weed out some of the b.s providers out there!

Thanks for reading this!
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.