PPP Poll: Ron Paul takes lead in Iowa

Fox News is already starting this shit. Probably because they seem him wining Iowa and don't like it.

Fox News - Why Ron Paul Isn't Presidential Material

Why are they trying to make an issue out of his son-in-law's past history? What does that have to do with him? He's not even a blood relative and RP says that they don't even speak and haven't spoken since 2003.

Fox has their own narrative.

Once again, they are living up to their name, FAUX NEWS.
 


The smears are out in force for the next couple weeks. The Republican establishment is threatened by a youth vote that has not been sufficiently Hannitized in party dogma.

It's going to get very interesting. If Paul's support is soft, he'll fall apart in the next 2 weeks. If his support is solid (his broad base) then he will power through, and after this round of attacks, they have nothing left to throw at him.

I for one, enjoy the entire show. I don't know if Paul can get elected, but I love seeing all of the cockroaches scurrying to disavow and attack him. He's not even trying to fuck them up, and they are all fucked up, so much so, that some Republicans are now saying they would vote for Obama over Paul, and the Iowa Governator claims that if Paul wins his state, that means Iowa should be ignored.

Funny how none of them have any populist or democratic values at the end of the day... not that we don't know that. Politicians are self serving criminals. The beauty of this is that they have to publicly and obviously repudiate their legitimacy in order to continue serving themselves.

There isn't room for all of these mental midgets and pygmies in a Ron Paul political order. This is the sound the system makes when its backed into the corner of inevitability.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kingofsp
I for one, enjoy the entire show. I don't know if Paul can get elected, but I love seeing all of the cockroaches scurrying to disavow and attack him.

Agreed. The damage is being done simply by his popularity growing. For people who doubted how screwed up and corrupt the whole system is, it is now becoming even more apparent. You really have to spell it out for some people and that's exactly what this does. I would obviously love to see him win because it would be amazing, but just watching them scurry is fun.
 
Rachel Maddow again devoted some significant time last night to the disconnect between the coverage Ron Paul gets in the media (in this case, specifically on Fox News) vs. his consistently strong poll numbers (in this case Iowa, where the latest PPP poll numbers put him in the lead, though worth Maddow later joins the chorus of people noting that Iowa actually isn't that important).

Says Maddow:
"It's possible to be the front-runner in Iowa without winning the Murdoch primary. Without getting Fox News on your side. To spend a little time trolling through Fox News channel news scripts on lexusnexus searching for the words Ron Paul shows what it means in 2011 to lose the Fox/Murdoch primary...If Fox News channel is talking smack about a particular republican candidate, the candidate they're likely talking smack about is Ron Paul."
Maddow attributes the tone of the coverage to the fact Ron Paul raises some uncomfortable truths about the contradictory state of the Republican party.
What's most interesting about Ron Paul is the extent to which his domestic stuff, his social issue libertarianism, his position on things like not just the war in Iraq but the war on drugs, calls out a really uncomfortable truth in modern republican politics which is Republicans want their brand to be small hands-off government. but the policies they support are more like big intrusive government.​
Read more: RACHEL MADDOW: Ron Paul Has Lost The FOX News Primary

Too funny. Ron Paul is making them uncomfortable because he is pointing out the disconnect between what they're saying and what they're actually supporting.
 
Had an odd conversation with a lady yesterday (mid-40s with 3 kids). We were discussing laws, taxes, the police force, war-making, and the truth about the state. The talk turned to POTUS...

Me: Do you know who Congressman Ron Paul is?

Her: Uh-uh.

Me: He is currently running for president. He's been a Congressman for decades.

Her: Oh! Yeah. He's the guy with glasses, right?

Me (on the inside): wtf?

It was a good reminder that some folks are completely uninformed, even with the talking heads spewing their lies. They toss their votes behind the most recognizable name, thinking their peers are doing the same (probably has something to do with social proof).

I made a sales pitch for Paul. Another guy was walking past and stopped to listen. After a few minutes, he says "I'm sold. Ron Paul's got my vote."

The ground war is fought one person at a time.
 
sigh... here is the MSM's next angle of attack

#OpESR - Occupy Iowa Caucuses - YouTube [FAKE VIDEO]

...so now they are going to try to say Ron Paul won because the polls were hacked?
I'm not so sure that's a total fake... Obviously it isn't the "one solitary voice of Anonymous" (& when is the last time we heard the one solitary voice of anonymous speak?) but it sounds too damning and eye-opening to the common man out there to be made by the MSM... It offers a bit too many scary facts that the MSM has no interest in sharing with the populace.

I'd bet some well-meaning but not-quite-brilliant junior anon hacker put that out with nothing but the support of a few of his closest anon buddies. -Not smart enough to see the overall ramifications of this decision, but still meaning to help RP and America.
 
12452374.jpg
 
If he wins Iowa he has a good chance of winning plenty more by getting voters who currently are in the mindset of 'I like him but he doesn't have a chance'.

/semidrunkbritfagouttie

Stupid sheeple, hopefully now they will start to realize. Ron Paul is the only one with any kind chance at stealing (if you can even call it that) a significant % Obama's voters.
 
It's going to get very interesting. If Paul's support is soft, he'll fall apart in the next 2 weeks. If his support is solid (his broad base) then he will power through, and after this round of attacks, they have nothing left to throw at him.

Reminds me of last time around except this time there is noticeable broad force behind the hype. You're right, it's going to be an interesting couple weeks.
 
People, for the most part, are little bitches. Politicians are in the same boat...but like times 10.

I know there is a lot of support for Ron Paul on this forum. And I know every few months somebody comes up with a plan to build spam links to his website or some shit. The time for that (if there ever was one) has passed.

He needs your money now. If you really believe in his campaign, you should donate. https://secure.ronpaul2012.com/
 
  • Like
Reactions: guerilla
Cafferty at CNN has been a constant Paul supporter. I am going to post one of today's blogs in its entirety below to save you the jump:

What will happen to the Republican field if Ron Paul wins the Iowa caucuses?

Two weeks from now we'll know the answer, but as of this moment, Ron Paul is the odds-on favorite to win the Iowa caucuses. And that has many mainstream Republicans positively apoplectic.

Despite being largely ignored by the mainstream media, the 76-year-old congressman from Texas is at - or near - the top of polls in Iowa entering the homestretch in the first 2012 GOP race for the White House.

What's refreshing is Paul has done it the old-fashioned way, with a consistent message and the best outreach operation in Iowa.

Andrew Sullivan writes for The Daily Beast that Paul is generating enthusiasm and support among young voters and Democrats and independents ... in other words, voters who could help Republicans defeat President Barack Obama in November.

You would think that's just what the Republican Party is looking for - someone who could defeat Obama next year.

Not so fast. Republicans are already set to spin a Paul win in Iowa by basically ignoring it.

A Washington Examiner column by Timothy Carney suggests the primary contest will get "downright ugly" if Paul wins in Iowa.

Carney points to Pat Buchanan's New Hampshire victory in 1996, saying both the Republican establishment and the media rallied to end his campaign.

Carney says if Paul wins, his critics will imply he is "a racist, a kook, and a conspiracy theorist."

Whether the GOP establishment likes it or not, Paul has the power to shake things up if he wins in Iowa.

People in Iowa are rallying around someone who, for the first time in a long time, represents real change. And that has to scare the hell out of both parties.
Very interesting indeed.
 
Holy shit.. it's getting good.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RiwUAMY_Xrw&feature=share]Cafferty : People In Iowa Are Rallying Around Someone Who Represents real change, REAL CHANGE! - YouTube[/ame]
 
^- Cafferty is one of the very few people I could stand listening to on CNN when I watched it.
 
Cafferty is right, if Paul does win there is going to be a big rush to discredit and ignore his victory. The narrative will be "omg Romney came in 2nd place with 20%, a month ago he was 4%, he's rapidly gaining support!"

If I was in the Ron Paul campaign, I'd start hinting that if he didn't get the nomination he would use his massive donor base and highly engaged backers to launch a 3rd party campaign in Ohio, Florida, Virginia, Nevada, and Arizona, all states that republicans must win in order to win the election.
 
I know there is a lot of support for Ron Paul on this forum. And I know every few months somebody comes up with a plan to build spam links to his website or some shit. The time for that (if there ever was one) has passed.

He needs your money now. If you really believe in his campaign, you should donate. https://secure.ronpaul2012.com/

agreed. He'll probably take Iowa... then it just comes down to will he have enough money to advertise in other key states like he has been in Iowa and NH.


If I was in the Ron Paul campaign, I'd start hinting that if he didn't get the nomination he would use his massive donor base and highly engaged backers to launch a 3rd party campaign in Ohio, Florida, Virginia, Nevada, and Arizona, all states that republicans must win in order to win the election.

Republicans don't want to win. If they did, they'd be rallying behind RP.
 
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fPDp0DhIenk&feature=share]Bill O'Reilly on Ron Paul Iran Policy = BS - YouTube[/ame]

This just proves that O'Reilly is a douche bag.