Peaceful Muslim Protests in Greece

That one British girl shows more intelligence than all those Muslims put together. She really shows them for what they are... fools

Exactly. This is hardly a situation that will get out of hand.

Right now, they're just like a little mosquito that won't stop buzzing around, causing a nuisance. If ever needed, I'm quite confident the Western govts can and will come down on them.

If needed, military force, and these idiots wouldn't stand a chance against. Or maybe a popular sentiment will take place demanding politicians take action, and new laws will be enacted so if you're a new immigrant to the UK but marching down the street screaming "UK go to hell", then your ass gets deported.
 


Why non-internet? Stuff is extremely limited w/out it. I don't even have a cable subscription - only internet. I don't have a newspaper subscription either. The internet opened up information access for everyone.

Anyway, I'm tired and don't feel like getting into a conversation on whether having access to limited information is the same as having limited freedom of speech. I doubt they're equivalent. All I know is as long the government doesn't kill or imprison me for saying "Jesus was a pedophile" or "Obama is a homosexual communist Muslim" then I likely have freedom of speech. I can even make public blogs saying this shit - available to the whole world.
So you're happy to admit both that the media is very limited without the internet, and that the people who don't read the internet based news are ignorant?

How about if I told you that barely over half (53% to be precise) of the US population have access to the internet. Then take away the amount that are computer literate enough to find these news sites.

And yes, you're totally fine on all that.

Providing you stick to the Freedom of Speech zones.

800px-First_amendment_area_Muir_Woods.jpg

First_amendment_zone2.jpg

Davis.jpg

Let's see. They don't want to assimilate. They don't like UK culture. They don't like UK law. Yet they want to live in the UK. Either they're dumb fucks or they're invaders. On the bright side, they're on a big island. They can't escape easily if the airports and ports are shutdown, if you know what I mean.
That or you're believing the propaganda.

Or you're totally right, and all Muslims genetically lack any form of logic.
 
So you're happy to admit both that the media is very limited without the internet, and that the people who don't read the internet based news are ignorant?

How about if I told you that barely over half (53% to be precise) of the US population have access to the internet. Then take away the amount that are computer literate enough to find these news sites.
And yes, you're totally fine on all that.
Providing you stick to the Freedom of Speech zones.

I definitely admit that the media and all information in general is limited w/out the internet. People who don't read/watch the internet are ignorant but only as ignorant as all of us are about things we've never heard of. We're all ignorant to some degree, it's mostly our responsibility to change that.. or do you think that's the governments responsibility? Is it corporate America's responsibility? Are you looking for a perfect news source? That's probably impossible since I think completely unbiased news is impossible.

Even before the internet there were plenty of sources of alternative news. Newsletters, magazines, clubs, books, etc.

There's also the fact that before the internet media was more expensive to make and limited physically. There was only so much space in a newspaper, so much time on TV stations, so much money to spend on both of those. Uncommon views would of course have limited exposure. It's the same way now for expensive media like TV and newspapers.

I'll agree with you that our freedom of speech is not perfectly protected. But we likely have more freedom of speech and press than ever before in history. My main point however is that Islamic rule would take that away IMO. I'm not sure what your main point is.
 
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gb8RYDaP5zI]Tensions high in Luton after a muslim man reportedly beat and sexually assaulted a Sikh girl - YouTube[/ame]


[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z3tg74jxOy4&feature=g-vrec]People of Luton Protest against Muslim Extremism Again on the 24th May - YouTube[/ame]
 
Cat strangler banned from pet ownership

A man who choked a tiny kitten so hard the cat's eyes bulged out and a retina nearly detached has been banned from owning a pet until a court orders otherwise.

The ACT Magistrates Court heard the 21-year-old came home from a bad day at work and took his anger out on Freddie the kitten.

art353-cat1-300x0.jpg


Mahmoud Ammouche will have a three-month suspended sentence hanging over his head for the next year after pleading guilty to animal cruelty.

Sounds Muslim to me!

Poor Freddie the cat. what are these Muslims going to do next?
 
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sDkhzHQO7jY]George Carlin - We Like War - YouTube[/ame]
 
Joe, Watch m0rtal's film and then the one about Luton.

You can't bomb this. It's about birthrates.

Now tell me, are you happy to see the demographics going in the direction they currently are?

Are you happy for there to be no Britons left in 100 years from now, only one more of the many Islamic states occupying the ex-british Parliament?

Are you happy that the majority of women in that country will be forced to wear burqas like they do in Saudi Arabia today?

Are you happy that science and critical thinking will be absolutely outlawed from those schools and replaced with exactly one religion class?

Or are you just going to keep your head firmly planted in the ground and deny the math and history here?

Ethnic minorities are just 9% in the UK (5% muslims, about 3% black and the rest Hindu/Sikh). Of those 5% about a third will be children and a third will be pensioners. So we are talking about max 2% muslims in child-bearing years. And only half of that group will be women.

How many children do those women need to have to ensure that "there are no Britons left" in 100 years time.

Answers on a postcard...
 
I should have added that though our ethnic minority portion is way lower than in the USA, we have higher rates of inter-marriage than Americans.

It produces people like Boris Johnson, London mayor (picture below):

borisjohnson_0.jpg


His grandfather was a Muslim Turkish, and I guess a hundred years ago someone would have made warning noises about him, being muslim and all. But guess what his descendant looks like after two generations?

Britain has very strong assimilative powers.
 
What percentage of London is white?

No idea. A large part of London arn't even citizens, they just work there (at least 200,000 French people work there for example, 123,000 Polish people, about 200,000 Germans, plus traders in the City from all corners of teh world, plus Irish commuting in from Dublin, and so on).

Who cares as long as they pay their taxes?

Other examples of what foreign countries could class as "mixed" but what we just think of as "Brits" - the Earl of Liverpool, who was Prime Minister from 1815 to 1827 (he had a Gujurati grandmother), Seb Coe (Olympic athlete who organised the 2012 Olympic games - he has a Hindu grandfather), Ian Duncan Smith (cabinet minister - Japanese grandmother), Jessica Ennis (Olympic athlete - Jamaican father) and so on.

Nobody looks at these people and thinks "ethnic minority". They've been absorbed and the dominant language and dominant culture remains exactly the same over time.

In Britain, it's class not race that divides people. If you are the right class, doors open for you regardless of your ethnicity and if you are the wrong class, doors shut regardless of ethnicity. Sooner of later people figure this out and "marry into" a level up. The Middletons are a classic case in point. On her mothers side, Kate Middleton has a bit of mining background, plus a bit of Jewish background. So if we still have a monarchy in a 100 years time, the king will be a descendant of a miner and a descendant of Jewish immigrants, as well as descendants of the other kings from his father.

Can't see that happening elsewhere. Look at the fuss people made about Obama for goodness sakes. I guess the Earl of Liverpool would really have shocked Americans back in the early 19thC if they'd known his roots!