Obama: "If You've Got A Business - You Didn't Build That."

did you bother to listen to his whole statement? you dont make him look dumb, you make yourself look dumb. if you dont like black people, or you want to have sex with obama and it bothers you admit that and spare us your stupidity. do you really think a majority of voters want to trust the country in the hands of inbreds like yourself?

theres no need to listen to his entire statement. speeches by politicians are never about their intentions. theyre about manipulating minds.

saying "you didnt build that" is wrong. the context doesnt matter. give me an example where a ruler telling his people that "you didnt build that" is not trying to make some of them angry at someone other.

saying "you didnt build that" where "that" refers to infrastructure which was built by stealing from the people in the first place is making them slaves.

saying "you didnt build that" where "you" refers to business owners and "that" refers to its employees invalidates the entirety of contract freedom within just 4 words.

that puts obama right behind hitler (endlösung/final solution) and mao (great leap forward) in the game of insult the most people with the fewest words. BUT NO NEED TO BE MAD OR ANYTHING
 


If truth is subjective, then everything he writes cannot be presented as more than an opinion.

It is my opinion, absolutely. And you have yours.

Most of the rest of what you wrote is ad hominem, so not really worth responding to. Glad I could make you guys feel good about yourselves.

I've presented my opinions and some data. Take from it what you will.
 
whats-going-on-in-this-thread.jpg
 
my mistake, i googled peano. reading now.

The peano axioms are the postulation of the existence of the natural numbers (1, 2, 3, ...).

Using only those, we could write 2+2 as 1+1 + 1+1 -> (2+1)+1 = 3+1 = 4, assuming you pick the usual names for the numbers.

Most of the math you have come in contact with can be derived from just that small set of axioms.

The exercise is a shitty one because 2+2 = 4 doesnt leave much space for showing off the ability to prove the validity of a statement. But before you can go any deeper, you should first at least acquire a solid understanding of a couple algebraic structures.
 
Don't they have spell check in your third world country??

globalaccess
Junior Member

Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 4
iTrader: 0 / 0%
reputation_pos.png



did you bother to listen to his whole statement? you dont make him look dumb, you make yourself look dumb. if you dont like black people, or you want to have sex with obama and it bothers you admit that and spare us your stupidity. do you really think a majority of voters want to trust the country in the hands of inbreds like yourself?
 
Most of the rest of what you wrote is ad hominem, so not really worth responding to.
Please don't use terms like "ad hominem" if you don't understand what they mean. It makes you look silly.

I've presented my opinions and some data. Take from it what you will.
You can't have opinions and data, because you already insisted truth was subjective. Your "data" only means whatever anyone wants it to mean, and thus, is without objective meaning at all.

This is not the first, but perhaps the last time I advise you to learn how to think logically. It will keep you from making these gross errors when you try to express yourself.
 
The peano axioms are the postulation of the existence of the natural numbers (1, 2, 3, ...).

Using only those, we could write 2+2 as 1+1 + 1+1 -> (2+1)+1 = 3+1 = 4, assuming you pick the usual names for the numbers.

Most of the math you have come in contact with can be derived from just that small set of axioms.

The exercise is a shitty one because 2+2 = 4 doesnt leave much space for showing off the ability to prove the validity of a statement. But before you can go any deeper, you should first at least acquire a solid understanding of a couple algebraic structures.

As much as I love maths this thread may have derailed here.
 
The peano axioms are the postulation of the existence of the natural numbers (1, 2, 3, ...).

Using only those, we could write 2+2 as 1+1 + 1+1 -> (2+1)+1 = 3+1 = 4, assuming you pick the usual names for the numbers.

Most of the math you have come in contact with can be derived from just that small set of axioms.

The exercise is a shitty one because 2+2 = 4 doesnt leave much space for showing off the ability to prove the validity of a statement. But before you can go any deeper, you should first at least acquire a solid understanding of a couple algebraic structures.

mattseh got served. skype dance off tonight

2004_You_Got_Served_101.jpg
 
that puts obama right behind hitler (endlösung/final solution) and mao (great leap forward) in the game of insult the most people with the fewest words. BUT NO NEED TO BE MAD OR ANYTHING

I wonder if you realize how utterly nonsensical you sound with this statement?

Thanks for the lol....
 
It is my opinion, absolutely. And you have yours.

Most of the rest of what you wrote is ad hominem, so not really worth responding to. Glad I could make you guys feel good about yourselves.

I've presented my opinions and some data. Take from it what you will.

Wow! I read through this whole thread. I actually admire your openness to express your opinions on the forum - which has long since become a farcical play featuring intellectual sycophants who are hand puppets to a few influencers on here. They usually support almost all arguments with some derivation of:
blah blah blah Mises Institute quote...
blah blah blah Cato Institute quote....
blah blah blah Ayn Rand quote...
blah blah blah "liberal", "socialist" "commie"

Then they never fail to start rattling off theories about communism and socialism though few if any can actually distinguish the difference between the two - let alone acknowledge that the US economy has always been mixed.

The best bit is when they start sprouting off economic theories (ain't naming no names) as if they've been judged as experts - by a jury of peers (note: anyone can call themselves an expert in medicine...if you haven't passed the boards you are not allowed to practice - well maybe on Wickedfire - haahah)


Anyhoo, it usually gets more entertaining. When other arguments don't work, they yell out "we don't want America to become like Europe! (as if it's one country mind you)". This conjures up a mythical 1967-esque mind-picture of a place where fair haired children stand in lines begging for bread while their grandmothers stay at home watching black and white TVs - glancing over at pictures of Lenin during commercials of course....

It's nice to know the more things change the more things stay the same on Wafo - mybad, I mean WF:smokin:
 
Wow! I read through this whole thread. I actually admire your openness to express your opinions on the forum - which has long since become a farcical play featuring intellectual sycophants who are hand puppets to a few influencers on here.
0tlIL.png
 
Then they never fail to start rattling off theories about communism and socialism though few if any can actually distinguish the difference between the two - let alone acknowledge that the US economy has always been mixed.

They are both shitty ideas about enslaving people for the greater good. no need to get lost in details.
 
Wow! I read through this whole thread. I actually admire your openness to express your opinions on the forum - which has long since become a farcical play featuring intellectual sycophants who are hand puppets to a few influencers on here. They usually support almost all arguments with some derivation of:
blah blah blah Mises Institute quote...
blah blah blah Cato Institute quote....
blah blah blah Ayn Rand quote...
blah blah blah "liberal", "socialist" "commie"

Blah blah blah socialist. Blah blah blah Rothbard quote:

Murray Rothbard said:
It is no crime to be ignorant of economics, which is, after all, a specialized discipline and one that most people consider to be a 'dismal science.' But it is totally irresponsible to have a loud and vociferous opinion on economic subjects while remaining in this state of ignorance.
 
Wow! I read through this whole thread. I actually admire your openness to express your opinions on the forum - which has long since become a farcical play featuring intellectual sycophants who are hand puppets to a few influencers on here. They usually support almost all arguments with some derivation of:
blah blah blah Mises Institute quote...
blah blah blah Cato Institute quote....
blah blah blah Ayn Rand quote...
blah blah blah "liberal", "socialist" "commie"

Then they never fail to start rattling off theories about communism and socialism though few if any can actually distinguish the difference between the two - let alone acknowledge that the US economy has always been mixed.

The best bit is when they start sprouting off economic theories (ain't naming no names) as if they've been judged as experts - by a jury of peers (note: anyone can call themselves an expert in medicine...if you haven't passed the boards you are not allowed to practice - well maybe on Wickedfire - haahah)


Anyhoo, it usually gets more entertaining. When other arguments don't work, they yell out "we don't want America to become like Europe! (as if it's one country mind you)". This conjures up a mythical 1967-esque mind-picture of a place where fair haired children stand in lines begging for bread while their grandmothers stay at home watching black and white TVs - glancing over at pictures of Lenin during commercials of course....

It's nice to know the more things change the more things stay the same on Wafo - mybad, I mean WF:smokin:
Stop making me ashamed of my nation.
 
Yeah, Obama is such a dick. Best to vote Romney in:

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2jqZ3C9I7To]Rachel Maddow - Romney's lying problem - YouTube[/ame]