NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

A real twitter message from Palin a few days ago :

"Tumultuous world gotcha' flummoxed? Divert w/tuning 2 unifying, sweet competition; Dancing w/the Stars TEAM BALLAS competes in finals tonite"


She's a modern day Thomas Jefferson or Benjamin Franklin. :evil_laughter:
 


ly2 from WF said:
DARRIN IS A LIBERAL
yab68.png


Click to expand...

fucker you can't just disappear on me then try and troll me.

I hate stupidity. I'm not a liberal. I just fucking hate stupid people who get too much attention.
 
Moxie said:
Thanks for bringing back a picture that outraged grandparents were email forwarding 3 years ago.
Click to expand...

And that makes it irrelevant?


Moxie said:
Not that this completely false, but why do corporations tend to favor republicans while labor unions favor democrats?
Click to expand...

I would like to see the numbers if you have them. It would be interesting to review.

Labor unions like large companies and organizations as well as bureaucracy. They hate start-ups, innovation, change, and new competitors in a market.

That is the only way the can organize. Labor unions ARE DETRIMENTAL to the middle and lower class as well as a force for stagnation in the economy. Look at what the Teachers union does in order to kill any innovation . Your post implies labor unions are good, or "for the people" - they are just the opposite. They are "for the union"



Moxie said:
Except for the current guy, the debt has gone down every time a democrat has been president since World War II. You have to go back 40 years to Nixon for the last reduction under a republican, and again back to Eisenhower for a substantial lowering.
Click to expand...

If you can back this up as a % of output or GDP or whatever figure you want to use - then it is valid. I am too young and too poorly educated (thanks public schools) to know the facts of every president. But I was around for Clinton and he benefited from dismantling the military and interest rates falling. He took long term debt and refinanced to short term this amplified the effect of the falling rates. With interest expense being a large portion of the debt - well, there goes the deficit. It was very risky at the time. Had interest rates gone up the Country would have been forced to refinance the Clinton short term debt at higher rates and it would have caused havoc. But luckily rates went down. Pure luck though. It was not a prudent move.
 
justo_tx said:
If you think the outside is bad, with its pandering and superficial patriotism, you should see the inside. Every morning inside they sacrifice Chinese communist babies in front of an alter with a golden statue of Ronald Reagan.
Click to expand...

lucky bastard, how'd you get a tour?
 
REIMktg said:
And that makes it irrelevant?
Click to expand...

Post all the pictures you want, but email chain stuff is typically misleading and therefore not very relevant to how I would vote.

Fact Checker - Obama Nabbed by the Patriot Police



Your post implies labor unions are good, or "for the people" - they are just the opposite.
Click to expand...

Then your post would imply that republicans are for the people. They are the ones more likely to give Walmart and such special tax breaks and benefits that the smaller businesses often don't get. This is corporatism, which is not free market.


If you can back this up as a % of output or GDP or whatever figure you want to use - then it is valid.
Click to expand...

National debt by U.S. presidential terms - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


US_Federal_Debt_as_Percent_of_GDP_by_President.jpg
 
hahahahahahhaha, I had this exact message like the subject of this thread last night!!!!! Out of my life in a club :D

noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

Obviously, still not ok....
 
it's amazing to think that people here would rather vote for someone universally renowned for her blatant stupidity and blind american exceptionalism just to not have obama in office. why? in the name of saving a small percentage in taxes? i hate taxes too, and i hate the way my tax money is spent, but really?? y'all be brainwashed. one thing to keep in mind is the rest of the world views Obama - and therefore America - in a much more positive way than they'd ever view Palin (and America with Palin). that's pretty fucking important.

those who equate Obama with 'socialism' and Palin with 'freedom' (er...whatever) need to get their heads checked. the only person who stands a chance at making America less socialist is Ron Paul. at least Obama would tend to be less empire building prone than i imagine Palin would be. she's fucking clueless. get a grip. watch her interviews. look at who she's being interviewed by. it's retarded.
 
so she's a creationist who doesn't believe in global warming but believes in abstinence education. AKA she's blind, stubborn, stupid, hypocritical and not afraid to toe the party line. great job babe!!
 
ly2 from WF said:
I find it hard to believe she, or anyone for that matter, could do a worse job than Obama TBH
Click to expand...

lol u serious? obama inherited a shitty situation and made it worse, bush fucked things up in the first place. palin would make the US an even bigger joke than bush did.
 
mr doodles70 said:
it's amazing to think that people here would rather vote for someone universally renowned for her blatant stupidity and blind american exceptionalism just to not have obama in office. why? in the name of saving a small percentage in taxes? i hate taxes too, and i hate the way my tax money is spent, but really?? y'all be brainwashed. one thing to keep in mind is the rest of the world views Obama - and therefore America - in a much more positive way than they'd ever view Palin (and America with Palin). that's pretty fucking important.

those who equate Obama with 'socialism' and Palin with 'freedom' (er...whatever) need to get their heads checked. the only person who stands a chance at making America less socialist is Ron Paul. at least Obama would tend to be less empire building prone than i imagine Palin would be. she's fucking clueless. get a grip. watch her interviews. look at who she's being interviewed by. it's retarded.
Click to expand...

Haven't you let talk radio or psudeo-intellectual, message board pretend-entrepreneurs do the group thinking for you?

tLA7a.jpg


Adjusted for inflation:
US_Real_Wages_1964-2004.gif
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom