More NSA stuff

r3p1v

New member
Nov 17, 2006
2,531
17
0
Cnet is reporting that in the secret capitol hill briefing on Thursday it was revealed that NSA analysts had the authority to listen to domestic phone calls without a warrant.

This whole thing is huge on so many levels. The president went on TV and outright lied to the American people.

Not to mention the NSA is storing the world's communications in a giant datacenter. That is totally illegal and extremely dangerous. People need to go to jail for this.
 


braveheart_freedom.jpg
 
How the fuck does CNET know about this SECRET capitol hearing? It's supposed to be a fucking secret, but I guess its ok, after seeing the JODI ARIAS TRIAL going through the fucking shit storm and bitch is still alive, anything is possible.
 
Cnet is reporting that in the secret capitol hill briefing on Thursday it was revealed that NSA analysts had the authority to listen to domestic phone calls without a warrant.

This whole thing is huge on so many levels. The president went on TV and outright lied to the American people.

Not to mention the NSA is storing the world's communications in a giant datacenter. That is totally illegal and extremely dangerous. People need to go to jail for this.

Your outrage is about 20 years to late.

Whats that you say? NSA is spying on people on a epic scale;

yzBgxh3.jpg
 
There are more stories to come from Greenwald and The Guardian. What it looks like they are doing is putting out certain questions that get denials form officials. Then they release a story showing the denials were bullshit.

How the fuck does CNET know about this SECRET capitol hearing? It's supposed to be a fucking secret, but I guess its ok, after seeing the JODI ARIAS TRIAL going through the fucking shit storm and bitch is still alive, anything is possible.

Someone in Congress is dropping hints.
 
Be very affraid of what happens next. The illegal will magically become legal
 
What's also absurd is the FTC is going around suing people (Google, Facebook) for simple privacy problems. Meanwhile the government is storing the content of everybody's phone calls and emails without permission and without even disclosing that they are doing it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lincolndsp
What I'm curious about, is how many (and which) countries are collaborating on this? For example, take the NSA's new data center in Utah that's coming online shortly. I would imagine that's a multinational program. So how many other countries are involved in this surveillance network? Just a few Western countries, or do they have like 150 all feeding data to the NSA's network?

One world government, here we come baby! Maybe John Lennon will get his wish of a world without borders. Probably be a tad different than what he envisioned, but what the hell.
 
LOL these guys come out saying exactly the opposite:

Updated 11:03 a.m. ET, Sunday, 6/16

(CNN) – The chairman of the House intelligence committee strongly asserted Sunday that the National Security Agency is not recording Americans’ phone calls under U.S. surveillance programs, and any statements suggesting differently amount to “misinformation.”
Lining up with Obama administration officials — and the president himself — Rep. Mike Rogers, R-Michigan, said the NSA “is not listening to Americans’ phone calls” or monitoring their e-mails.

“If it did, it is illegal. It is breaking the law,” Rogers said on CNN’s “State of the Union.” “I think (Americans) think there's this mass surveillance of what you're saying on your phone call and what you're typing in your e-mails. That is just not happening.”

The NSA has repeatedly said that it collects only metadata — phone numbers and duration — of phone calls, but not the actual conversations taking place. If it needs to listen to a conversation, it must first obtain an order from the Federal Intelligence Surveillance Court.

But during a House judiciary committee hearing Thursday with FBI Director Robert Mueller, a Democratic congressman from New York said he was told in a classified discussion that NSA analysts were capable of obtaining specific information from phone calls without a warrant.

The congressman, Jerrold Nadler, issued a statement Sunday to CNN regarding his his exchange with Mueller at the hearing.

“I am pleased that the administration has reiterated that, as I have always believed, the NSA cannot listen to the content of Americans’ phone calls without a specific warrant," Nadler said.
Rogers: NSA


He's probably right about them not recording the calls. If the carrier records the calls, they are probably just accessing them from the carrier's servers.
 
Corruption begets more corruption and nothing is ever done, and nothing ever will because the conspirators are often those making the rules.
 
GCHQ getting outted:

Foreign politicians and officials who took part in two G20 summit meetings in London in 2009 had their computers monitored and their phone calls intercepted on the instructions of their British government hosts, according to documents seen by the Guardian. Some delegates were tricked into using internet cafes which had been set up by British intelligence agencies to read their email traffic.The revelation comes as Britain prepares to host another summit on Monday – for the G8 nations, all of whom attended the 2009 meetings which were the object of the systematic spying. It is likely to lead to some tension among visiting delegates who will want the prime minister to explain whether they were targets in 2009 and whether the exercise is to be repeated this week.

The disclosure raises new questions about the boundaries of surveillance by GCHQ and its American sister organisation, the National Security Agency, whose access to phone records and internet data has been defended as necessary in the fight against terrorism and serious crime. The G20 spying appears to have been organised for the more mundane purpose of securing an advantage in meetings. Named targets include long-standing allies such as South Africa and Turkey.

There have often been rumours of this kind of espionage at international conferences, but it is highly unusual for hard evidence to confirm it and spell out the detail. The evidence is contained in documents – classified as top secret – which were uncovered by the NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden and seen by the Guardian. They reveal that during G20 meetings in April and September 2009 GCHQ used what one document calls "ground-breaking intelligence capabilities" to intercept the communications of visiting delegations.

This included:
•  Setting up internet cafes where they used an email interception programme and key-logging software to spy on delegates' use of computers;
• Penetrating the security on delegates' BlackBerrys to monitor their email messages and phone calls;
• Supplying 45 analysts with a live round-the-clock summary of who was phoning who at the summit;
• Targeting the Turkish finance minister and possibly 15 others in his party;
•  Receiving reports from an NSA attempt to eavesdrop on the Russian leader, Dmitry Medvedev, as his phone calls passed through satellite links to Moscow.
...
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2013/jun/16/gchq-intercepted-communications-g20-summits
 
^ and just a year or two later they were dragging News Corp through the mud for what they were doing.
 
The NSA doesn't need to "record" you calls. They simply "store" and "analyze" your calls. If they want to have a human "listen" they simply get a rubber stamped warrant

It's all in the wording. When they are asked specifics pay attention to the question not the answer