Missing Malaysia Airlines Flight



MH370 disappearance: Chris Goodfellow's theory about a fire and Langkawi is wrong.

"For one thing, while it’s true that MH370 did turn toward Langkawi and wound up overflying it, whoever was at the controls continued to maneuver after that point as well, turning sharply right at VAMPI waypoint, then left again at GIVAL. Such vigorous navigating would have been impossible for unconscious men."
Also, to add to you you said, if there was a fire like Goodfellow mentioned, wouldn't it make more sense to first inform the traffic control operator, before pulling all the busses and everything else out?
 
This make take a bit to get to the point, but that's the way I roll.

When I was a kid, my cousins and I decided it would be great fun to collect a bunch of snails, put them in a big pile, douse them with acetone and fire them up.
You might say we were sick little individuals with warped perspectives about right and wrong, but honestly, to this day, they were snails. I don't lose sleep over it.

So, as the snail pyre burns down, a younger cousin decides to squirt a good amount of acetone onto that diminishing flame. Seems reasonable, except I was on the other side and received the now flaming acetone all over my leg.

I'm guessing you probably haven't had burning leg syndrome before. Here's how it works. You bring the burning leg up where you can slap the flames out with your hands. Meanwhile, you hop around on your other leg trying as hard as you can not to land in the still burning snail pyre.

The last fucking thing on my mind at the time was to inform the traffic control operator.
 
This make take a bit to get to the point, but that's the way I roll.

When I was a kid, my cousins and I decided it would be great fun to collect a bunch of snails, put them in a big pile, douse them with acetone and fire them up.
You might say we were sick little individuals with warped perspectives about right and wrong, but honestly, to this day, they were snails. I don't lose sleep over it.

So, as the snail pyre burns down, a younger cousin decides to squirt a good amount of acetone onto that diminishing flame. Seems reasonable, except I was on the other side and received the now flaming acetone all over my leg.

I'm guessing you probably haven't had burning leg syndrome before. Here's how it works. You bring the burning leg up where you can slap the flames out with your hands. Meanwhile, you hop around on your other leg trying as hard as you can not to land in the still burning snail pyre.

The last fucking thing on my mind at the time was to inform the traffic control operator.



Snails...................SNAILS?!!!!

Turbo.jpg



BASTARD!!!!
 
Latest news says people in the Maldives saw a very low flying aircraft at that time which matched the description in colors.

This plane was, as some theories suggested, most likely hijacked by the US gov and landed on a military base in the Indian ocean.

Not the first time the US has experience with hijacking planes either.

You honestly think that's the most likely solution?

Assumptions:

  1. The US has motivation to hijack this plane
  2. The US would risk international backlash for the sake of stealing a plane
  3. The US can hijack a plane and fly it for thousands of miles undetected
  4. Those people in the Maldives saw the exact plane in question
  5. The satellite that indicates the last known position of the plane is wrong
  6. The US can land a plane on a military base in the indian ocean completely undetected

Vs the electrical fire in the cockpit.

Assumptions:

  1. There was a fire that destroyed the communication channels
  2. The pilot turned to emergency land the plane
  3. The pilots passed out from smoke inhalation

I know it's fun to come up with all these far out ideas for what could have happened to this plane, but the more assumptions that are involved in coming to that decision, the less likely it is to be correct. Every single assumption you make reduces the chance of that being what happened by an order of magnitude.

Also, to add to you you said, if there was a fire like Goodfellow mentioned, wouldn't it make more sense to first inform the traffic control operator, before pulling all the busses and everything else out?

No, communicating is the last thing a pilot should try to do. First priority is the aircraft and everyone on board. Communicating you have a problem is the least priority. There's no point in communicating if you're going to be dead in seconds/minutes, every second counts.

If the cockpit is on fire, are you going to think "oh shit, how do I tell airtraffic control?" or "oh shit, how do I put this fire out to stop us all from dying?"
 
Vs the electrical fire in the cockpit.

Assumptions:

  1. There was a fire that destroyed the communication channels
  2. The pilot turned to emergency land the plane
  3. The pilots passed out from smoke inhalation

I know it's fun to come up with all these far out ideas for what could have happened to this plane, but the more assumptions that are involved in coming to that decision, the less likely it is to be correct. Every single assumption you make reduces the chance of that being what happened by an order of magnitude.

Obvious NSA agent is obvious
 
Occam's razor
&
KISS

Oh, and bureaucrats and politicians can make a complicated mess (pile of shit) of the simplest things. Then there is the news media...



 
You would think with the government the way it is, that they could track this shit. Even with that "transponder off", they should implement some type of "GPS" tracker on the plane (I'm sure they have this), that way an exact position (+/-) a foot of the last whereabouts, speed, altitude, other misc info would be logged.

GPS comms is one way. The sats tell you their position and your Garmin / whatever software triangulates your location from there, no data transmits back as that would be ludicrous amounts of unnecessary data traffic.
 
Occam's razor
&
KISS

Oh, and bureaucrats and politicians can make a complicated mess (pile of shit) of the simplest things. Then there is the news media...




Occams Razor says this plane is one of the safest, if not THE safest, plane ever built.

Someone is withholding information, that I am sure of, but it could just as well be to hide incompetence.
 
A lot of "debris" popping up recently, also I think I read that that the cargo had a ton of batteries, fueling the fire theory.. hopefully this gets solved soon!
 
Why is this still all over the news? This has been the only story I have seen anytime I turn the news on all week. It doesn't matter the network, or the time. The real question is not what happened to that plane, or what new regulations are in order. The real question is why is this story getting so much attention?
 
Occam's razor
&
KISS

Oh, and bureaucrats and politicians can make a complicated mess (pile of shit) of the simplest things. Then there is the news media...


HOW FUCKING SIMPLE IS IT NOW MOTHERFUCKER? OCCUMS' ASSHOLE.
yes i bumped this thread.
 
HOW FUCKING SIMPLE IS IT NOW MOTHERFUCKER? OCCUMS' ASSHOLE.
yes i bumped this thread.

Eh?

It still seems quite simple to me. It's at the bottom of the indian ocean somewhere, we're just trying to find out where.

I still maintain something happened on the plain, they tried to turn and emergency land, lost consciousness and flew out into the ocean.