source?Dude, that spinal cord shit is a myth. Some anti-drug program probably came up with it to try to scare kids away from acid, ecstasy, shrooms, ect.
source?Dude, that spinal cord shit is a myth. Some anti-drug program probably came up with it to try to scare kids away from acid, ecstasy, shrooms, ect.
source?
Yesss, practice with your mouth on that thing, my pretty! Yessss
source?
i wasn't debating, i don't know if it is or not. I was curious and wanted to find out. Hence why I asked for a source.It should be you quoting a source to prove it is right, not others having to quote a source that disproves it. And yes, it is a myth.
I appreciate you hooking me up with some info and not to knock the effort but this report is laughable. It looked legit at first but after reading the whole thing I can't possibly take it seriously. All the studies it quotes are from the early 60's and 70's back when scientists thought lsd was a positive mind enhancing drug with possible military advantages. It downplays the effects of LSD waaay too much to a level thats unbelievable to anyone whos even tried it. The drug didn't even reach the market until the mid 40's and had no mass appeal until late 50's early 60's. They didn't even realize it would have an adverse effect on pregnancies back then. And the latest source quote i can find in there is '83. Nothing remotely recent.
In Science 30 April 1972, Volume 172 Number 3982 p. 431-440 there was an article by Norman I. Dishotsky, William D. Loughman, Robert E. Mogar and Wendell R. Lipscomb titled "LSD and Genetic Damage - Is LSD chromosome damaging, carcinogenic, mutagenic, or teratogenic?". They reviewed 68 studies and case reports published 1967-1972, .... does not cause detectable genetic damage, and is not a teratogen or carcinogen in man."
I'm not so sure this would apply to modern lsdWell, there's the study by Sidney Cohen which was cited here recently, Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 130, 1960. The following is from Jay Stevens' Storming Heaven: "Cohen surveyed a sample of five thousand individuals who had taken LSD twenty-five thousand times. He found and average of 1.8 psychotic episodes per thousand ingestions, 1.2 attempted suicides, and 0.4 completed suicides. 'Considering the enormous scope of the psychic responses it induces,' he concluded, 'LSD is an astonishingly safe drug.'
As it stands now I'm still on the fence.Actually, I think the fact that PharmChem analyzed something on the order of 2,000 LSD samples between 1972 and 1979 and never found one with strychnine in it ... however, at least under .05%. More a little later.
that makes me wonder. Now that I think about it the only people I know that salvia actually worked on were people who do a lot of acid and shrooms. And I did all my experimenting with salvia well before i ever tried acid or shrooms and I tried it many times with all different potencies. Maybe thats the trick. It pulls chemicals out of your spinal cord or some shit so if you've done a lot of hallucinogens it works better. idk.
She over acts on everything. One hit and a couple seconds later she is tripping out, nothing is that fast. It's like the people who think they are drinking alcohol acting like they are drunk.
Clearly those in the video are only putting up with her because she is a celebrity, which is obvious by how the girl holding the camera comments.
He was speaking math, and fighting dragons, and was eaten by a clam. All kinds of crazy shit.
LSD is not a fat soluble ergoline. It's half life is something like 6 hours IIRC.
Psilocybin is slightly fat soluble, but nothing I've seen shows it an anything like THC. THC is much more fat soluble - piss testing for weeks later. There is no urban legend about getting high weeks later from cracking your back, etc.
In any case, spinal fluid is replenished frequently and daily, so even if non-dissolved LSD molecule crossed the csf/blood barrier it wouldn't hang out for long. No tryptamine or phenethylamine that I know of sticks around in a human body for decades or has oxidative properties strong enough to cause chromosome damage.
LSD got the bad rap for being stuck in your spinal cord, causing genetic damage, etc since it was the most widely popularized psychedelic. They needed a demon and it fit.
As for the lack of recent, rigorous studies - you will not find more than a handful. The government says drugs in that schedule are bad, have no medical use, etc so they cannot be studied (basically).
MAPS does some research with lsd/psilocybin but it is very slow going. MAPS: Multidisciplinary Association for Psychedelic Studies You could check their site for more information.
They already did. It's illegal in like 20-30 states, including mine (for like the past 5 years).
that bitch has a annoying laugh