Men, Do... Not... Marry.

Court still strip you of custody and stick you with child support, even if you're not married.

But no alimony and only if the kid is yours (which means it's your gene anyway).

Marriage is one of various societies way to ration females to males that can't pay. The next one is setting child support proportional to males income.
 


81d69cb17f192815055a67cbb1ba026d36ff1d75
 
Man marry so that when the aliens take over Earth, we'll have lot's of practice dealing with creatures from another planet.
 
:: Whoa!! How did you become a millionare?!?!

::: Oh, easy, you see, i used to be a billionaire, and got married.
 
But no alimony and only if the kid is yours (which means it's your gene anyway).

WRONG! There are many cases where men have to support the kids even if they are not biologically theirs. This is known as a bastard law and is enforced to protect the welfare of the child regardless of paternity.

a couple of examples:
Dad Forced to Continue Paying Child Support for Kids That Aren't His - ParentDish
Dad wasn't dad after all, but still owes child support / The Christian Science Monitor - CSMonitor.com
Daily Blog: Paying child support - AskMen.com
 
lol thanks for the offer, Rexibit. Made me laugh. :)

I was fucked over once. In high school. That was a long time ago. I've been with my current woman for years, and have never been happier. She's got a brain, and that's key.

But I cringe at the bullshit guys put themselves through over girls. I've never understood why guys marry. Breasts and vaginas are only interesting for awhile. Then, what?

That's why you only marry attractive women WHO ARE GREAT COOKS.

Seriously - passion fluctuates over time, whereas cooking only gets better.

Anyone who marries a person who can't / won't cook is crazy imo.


Also - it's not marriage that's the tie-down, it's kids. I know people who've lived together, had kids and then split up, and it's just as a big a mess.

EDIT - actually - I agree with what he says about going to asia and marrying. Asian women are all great at cooking.
 
Hrmm, I'm teetering on whether he's great or a fucking piece of shit pedophile. Tough one. (no its not)

Context is important. I'm fairly certain Reed is not saying, "I can't wait to stick my penis into the vagina of a 14-year-old." I've been reading him a long time, and have never gotten that impression.

I think he's saying, "Look. Here's a lesson on male nature. Straight guys, in general, will never get enough female flesh.[1] And a lot of straight guys love young girls.[2] And some guys are gonna wanna dip their wick into 14-year-old girls.[3]"

Is Reed a pedophile? I don't know the man, so I can't vouch for him. But I'm guessing not. Plus, I happen to agree with him, and I'm not a pedophile.[4] I think he's exposing an uncomfortable (i.e. politically incorrect) slice of male nature. Not all men want to have sex with 14-year-olds. I don't. But a quick Google Image search for "jailbait" implies that a lot of guys would.

jailbait.png



It's similar to women calling old guys "dirty old men" just because they're looking at 20-year-olds in bikinis. "No lady. I'm looking because I'm a guy."



[1] true.

[2] also true.

[3] the reason 18 is the cutoff on porn sites is not because guys don't want to look at 17-year-olds (or 16, or 15, or... you get the point).

[4] though this is the internet, so who can tell these things? We're all innocent or superheroes online.
 
Context is important. I'm fairly certain Reed is not saying, "I can't wait to stick my penis into the vagina of a 14-year-old." I've been reading him a long time, and have never gotten that impression.

I think he's saying, "Look. Here's a lesson on male nature. Straight guys, in general, will never get enough female flesh.[1] And a lot of straight guys love young girls.[2] And some guys are gonna wanna dip their wick into 14-year-old girls.[3]"

Is Reed a pedophile? I don't know the man, so I can't vouch for him. But I'm guessing not. Plus, I happen to agree with him, and I'm not a pedophile.[4] I think he's exposing an uncomfortable (i.e. politically incorrect) slice of male nature. Not all men want to have sex with 14-year-olds. I don't. But a quick Google Image search for "jailbait" implies that a lot of guys would.

jailbait.png



It's similar to women calling old guys "dirty old men" just because they're looking at 20-year-olds in bikinis. "No lady. I'm looking because I'm a guy."



[1] true.

[2] also true.

[3] the reason 18 is the cutoff on porn sites is not because guys don't want to look at 17-year-olds (or 16, or 15, or... you get the point).

[4] though this is the internet, so who can tell these things? We're all innocent or superheroes online.

Just to point out a few other things that Jake didn't address in his post (great logic btw):


  1. Historically, it's only been a short time (last century or so) since it was socially acceptable for young (13-15 year old) girls to marry older men (20-30+).
  2. Historically, it was the local society that determined what was acceptable in terms of young girls having relations with older men.
  3. Laws and times have changed in Western cultures so that we can't go and castrate a man who took advantage of a younger girl, so we have laws about the age at which they can be legally approached.
  4. In some countries and cultures, it's still acceptable for young (13-15+) women to sleep around with older men.
My point is, historically (because women do mature physically a lot faster than men), young women (13-15+) and older men have always had a connection. I'm not saying it's presently acceptable, but the lifestyle was much harsher in the past so you wanted the most viable male (and if they were older then chances are they were stronger physically and health-wise) to be your husband. Also, it usually meant they were more successful.
 
Just to point out a few other things that Jake didn't address in his post (great logic btw):


  1. Historically, it's only been a short time (last century or so) since it was socially acceptable for young (13-15 year old) girls to marry older men (20-30+).
  2. Historically, it was the local society that determined what was acceptable in terms of young girls having relations with older men.
  3. Laws and times have changed in Western cultures so that we can't go and castrate a man who took advantage of a younger girl, so we have laws about the age at which they can be legally approached.
  4. In some countries and cultures, it's still acceptable for young (13-15+) women to sleep around with older men.
My point is, historically (because women do mature physically a lot faster than men), young women (13-15+) and older men have always had a connection. I'm not saying it's presently acceptable, but the lifestyle was much harsher in the past so you wanted the most viable male (and if they were older then chances are they were stronger physically and health-wise) to be your husband. Also, it usually meant they were more successful.

You bring up a lot of interesting points, Rexibit. Cultures change, and people have short memories.

On a semi-related note, here's Kim Kardashian at 14:


kim-kardashian-14.jpg




I'll bet a few adults on this board are thinking the same thing this guy's thinking:


roman-polanski-sex-offender.jpg


"That's what I'm talking about!"
 
Just to point out a few other things that Jake didn't address in his post (great logic btw):


  1. Historically, it's only been a short time (last century or so) since it was socially acceptable for young (13-15 year old) girls to marry older men (20-30+).
  2. Historically, it was the local society that determined what was acceptable in terms of young girls having relations with older men.
  3. Laws and times have changed in Western cultures so that we can't go and castrate a man who took advantage of a younger girl, so we have laws about the age at which they can be legally approached.
  4. In some countries and cultures, it's still acceptable for young (13-15+) women to sleep around with older men.
My point is, historically (because women do mature physically a lot faster than men), young women (13-15+) and older men have always had a connection. I'm not saying it's presently acceptable, but the lifestyle was much harsher in the past so you wanted the most viable male (and if they were older then chances are they were stronger physically and health-wise) to be your husband. Also, it usually meant they were more successful.

Yep - it's amazing how short people's memories are. For most of European history, age of consent to marry was 14 for boys and 12 for girls.

Being attracted to a girl who is sexually mature is not depraved - it's human nature. Whether or not it's legal, morally right or advisable is another thing entirely. In Greek times, it was considered a good and proper thing for older men to take up with young boys (pederasty). But then they also thought slavery was the right and proper order of things, and murder was settled by blood feud.
 
Image fail on Kardashian - pretty sure this is the pic you're referring to though:

kim.jpg


and yes most guys would jump straight into bed with her if they didn't know her age. Pedophilia is being attracted to prepubescent children and this is clearly not a prepubescent child. However, as the father of a 15 year old girl I'm glad we have the laws we have. I'd hate to have to get the shotgun out...
 
men marry as a way of "securing the pussy" since their understanding of how to get it in abundance is not developed.

the problem is, most of the time marriage leads to no sex anyway.

this is all based on speculation.
 
This thread sounds like it has elements of pedo, including the article op quotes:

...heterosexual males have an intense, clamoring, damned near irresistible interest in female flesh, certainly including that of semi-denuded girls of fourteen. Any man who denies this is lying through his teeth, and all the rest of us males know it. If you add that girls fairly early learn to provoke such interest, sometimes making a game of it before they are old enough to quite understand what they are doing, you have a recipe for trouble. Society generally is wise enough not to allow men to be tempted by excessively young females. Most men would successfully resist. Some wouldn't. We all understand this.

I mean wtf? I like women, not fucking children.

When I was 18 or so I found the idea of birds younger than 15/16 a bit strange. . . This bloke sounds like a closet pedo who's trying to convince himself everyone shares his opinion. Anyone who lusts after what is essentially a child is fucking weirdo. He needs to take a fucking look at himself.

When my 15 year old sister had a boyfriend of 22, pretty much everyone I knew, including my family, thought he was a fucking weirdo for not finding a woman, like as in an adult his age and not someone who's still pretty much a child.
 
This thread sounds like it has elements of pedo, including the article op quotes:



I mean wtf? I like women, not fucking children.

When I was 18 or so I found the idea of birds younger than 15/16 a bit strange. . . This bloke sounds like a closet pedo who's trying to convince himself everyone shares his opinion. Anyone who lusts after what is essentially a child is fucking weirdo. He needs to take a fucking look at himself.

When my 15 year old sister had a boyfriend of 22, pretty much everyone I knew, including my family, thought he was a fucking weirdo for not finding a woman, like as in an adult his age and not someone who's still pretty much a child.


He speaks the truth, hell I'm 16 and prefer 18 year olds
 
Speaking as a 30 year old who just finished his second year in university... I will never go back to sleeping with women anywhere near my own age.

If you need to know why, find yourself a 19 year old girl and a 30 year old woman, strip them naked and have them stand side by side. Enough said.