1. It's not the cattle that was subsidized, it's the cattle's food.So you are saying unsubsidized cattle is the key to defeating obesity? LOL.
2. I clearly just laid out for you that it is about the whole CUISINE being subsidized, not just the cattle's food.
3. No one said it can be easily reversed. "LOL."
...Which is all a part of the bigger issue of economics. They wouldn't be able to without the economics at play.My point is Luke, eating red meat isn't making Americans fat. Drinking soda, eating fast food, watching tv for 4 hours, and pounding down krispie kreme donuts are the things that are making America fat.
THIS ISN'T ABOUT FUCKING ECONOMICS. IT'S ABOUT WHAT PEOPLE ARE ACTUALLY EATING AND DRINKING.
Look, we both agree that the bigger picture of cuisine here is making Americans fat. There's no need to yell, bro. But you people who don't see economics as a primary driver for, well, everything, are only standing in the way of any possible solution.
Economics isn't just about pointing to who gets rich... It's about what is POSSIBLE. You can't have a culture filled with horrible junkfood like ours without some serious economic trade-offs.
Currently the trade-offs are about government giving money to farmers so that shit that is bad for you is cheap. This isn't conspiracy theory, it's fact.
When the shit that is bad for you is available to the poor more easily than the good shit, then your nation's poor simply cannot help but look like a bunch of lard asses.
Solve the economic problem here and the cuisine problem will be automatically solved by the free market... Because yeah, poor ppl won't be able to afford a big mac anymore, meanwhile wholesome food won't be out of their budget anymore as the market equalizes.
Balls I got; time for skype I do not. Besides, I've never been one to argue just for the sake of the one person I'm arguing with... Future readers need to know this important shit.If you really have some balls Luke, "enlighten" me on Skype.