it doesnt matter what you know or the judge knows. it is pretty much assumed, for good reason, that you cant just get some default bullshit attached to your name and that if you want to fight it youd have to prove your innocence, after paying a couple hundred k because someone said so.
What the hell are you rambling about? This is a civil case. If I claim you owe me money and I sue you and you refuse to show up to court, what do you think happens? if you get a speeding ticket and you don't show up to your court date, what do you think happens?
He had every opportunity to file a statement of defence, instead he denied the court's existence, denied his own existence, tried to extort the other party, and called all judges pedos.
even if you pissed him off. its kind of the point of a judge to not be guided by his emotions. he clearly tried to mess with the system. if thats a problem for the system, it can make that a criminal offense and pursue it in criminal court. judges cant just throw a tantrum because a defendant tries to pull stuff - and if they can, thats a problem.
Read Cardine's post for a logical explanation of why you shouldn't be allowed to file frivolous documents, run up the other side's legal bills, waste taxpayer money, and then claim ignorance.
This case had nothing to do with the judge "throwing a tantrum", and everything to do with the defendant acting like a total moron. He 100% had a chance to defend himself in court, and he chose not to take it.
what grunin did does not matter.
Actually, what you do in court
does in fact matter. That's why they have a courthouse...and court clerks...and court reporters...and lawyers..and judges..and statutes governing court procedures...and mountains of procedural paperwork documenting every minute aspect of the process.
hes guaranteed due process.
He had due process. He was entitled to file a statement of defence and he chose not exercise that right.
if he raped a dozen children in an orphanage and then tried to blackmail the parents with the evidence, that would be a not so cool thing to do. doesnt matter how over the top the offense. hes guaranteed a fair trial before an impartial court/judge.
You're not making any sense. The standard of proof is completely different in a criminal case. This isn't a criminal case.
some day, youre on the wrong side of this not all that fair justice system. and then youll bitch. but it was so much fun to laugh at all these other people getting raped.
The justice system has plenty of flaws. This case does not expose any of them. If anything, this is an example of the legal system working remarkably well.