Perhaps it's just me, but when people start using the "we" reference, I always think they believe they are part of a new magical group.
We wickedfire members should know better. :action-smiley-027:
Bitcoin has been around for close to 5.5 years but has only seen any kind of real acceptance on the retail side in the last year or so, and even then it's still sparse.
5.5 years after whitepapers were written at Darpa about the internet, we didn't even have America Online yet!
I'd say these big services today like blockchain.info and Coinbase are bitcoin's AOL and Prodigy. Can't freaking wait until we have a real contender for the 'web browser' of bitcoin... I'd imagine that would look something like a completely decentralized iTunes... But for buying everything on planet earth via bitcoin, anonymously.
So how is it that a new coin must have wide ranging retail acceptance out of the gate if it is to hope to survive when the grand poobah of cryptocurrencies is still lacking in acceptance?
They simply must grow in tandem. Think of each of the three pillars as the incentive for usage of the other two pillars... One slips behind, it hurts the growth of the other two pillars.
As you said, the merchant adoption is still pretty sparse... This is exactly what should be expected right now because frankly, user adoption is still sparse too.
Only 2 million active bitcoin addresses have shown up on the blockchain. There has got to be a Billion merchants on this planet right now, so if only 50,000 merchants accept bitcoin at the moment, it's quite closely in line with what you'd expect.
Users: 2 Million / 7 Billion = 0.35% global adoption
Merchants: ~50 k / ~115 Million = 0.23% global adoption
(Those numbers are my best guesses based off several sources like bitcointalk & wikipedia... A very wide margin here.)
Very similar ratios nonetheless!
Everything is proceeding just as Satoshi planned. Don't sweat it bro.