I am sorry if I do not make this clear before
Actually no. I just like to steer up controversy.
The issue is where do we draw the line? Google money tree do not explicitly commit fraud or force people. If they do, it wouldn't be FTC they're dealing with. More like DA with some jail term. What would libertarian think about it? Forcing people to disclose information about the deals like lemon laws? That doesn't sound libertarian.
Also google money tree is not the only scheme with this issue.
For example, customers are not aware that they are paying $80/month. However, they "effectively" agree due to some twisted form of logic. The terms of paying $80 somewhere else that customers do not read.
Basically FTC stand, which is quite reasonable, is that when part of a deal is MATERIAL, it has to be in front and customers have to EXPLICITLY agree rather than just implicitly agree.
By precedence of google money tree, MATERIAL terms that can have adverse effect of a deal will have to be agreed upon EXPLICITLY rather than implicitly.
Well, the same way, did Beatty Chadwick explicitly agree to pay 2.5 million to his wife? Did many husband that are paying $3k alimony to ex wife that is already fucking someone else explicitly agree to this exit clause contract?
People promise to love each other in the marriage. Why not make the marriage vow to be more "comprehensive". Why not include I agree to support the children of this woman no matter who the father is?
By agreeing to get married people IMPLICITLY agree to be bound by the law of marriage. The law of marriage, drafted by congress rather than marrying couple, based on interests of swing voters in a sense become some form of "contract". Most people do not even read the contract. Most of us are indoctrinated not to even bother reading the detail of the law counting instead of love. Worse, all alternative are illegal or politically incorrect, especially those DIRECTLY competing with marriage, like prostitution, contract marriage, and polygamy.
It's as if, societies and legislators WANT you to get married. Under libertarian societies, societies' interest should mean absolutely NOTHING when it comes to consensual terms. Yet in sex, it's significant.
Basically by prohibiting google money tree we fret over companies stealing $80 here and there, which I think is a healty experience for people to be careful. Getting screwed small time is a good thing for xp. Yet, we allow congressmen and politicians to lie. We allow government to spread unobjective facts about druge.
We allow the army to encourage children to become soldiers without fully explaining of what can happen. In Iran, kids are told to run through land mines. Hell, and we thought MDMA is dangerous for minor ha?
We have very complicated laws that NO BODY can understand, and then blame the poor guy that broke it.
Case Studies
In a sense the law is like a contract between us and society. A contract too long and too complicated no body is actually reading it. Justice system in all countries are a mockery of common sense. In one hand we gives thieves burglars and robbers so many right that they often go free out of technicality just to make REALLY SURE we do not convict a single innocent. On the other hand, DA can effectively FORCE innocent people to confess with plea bargain. Obviously given that almost everything is a crime, a DA won't have problem finding something as bargaining position for plea bargain. In US 90% of conviction is on plea bargain like Alford. Just look at here
http://www.angelfire.com/stars4/justiceforkirstin/Kirstin_s_Story/kirstin_s_story.html as a sample. A DA can even bribe anyone to testify against you and that's legal. Beyond reasonable doubt ha? Well, only if you have OJ's lawyer.
In my country, don't ask. Money talk.
The idea of justice in US is DA think he should punish you for rejecting plea bargain. The same way in Indonesia, DA would want to punish you for not paying him. What's the difference? Both is not about whether you're guilty or not.
Signing up to google money tree is a mistake. A mistake google money tree want you to make. The same way, getting married is a mistake for beatty chadwick, Tiger Wood, and this guy
http://wendymcelroy.com/news.php?extend.2758 .
Getting married is a mistake for my high school friend that now cannot go out of marriage despite the fact that she wanted too. It's a mistake. A mistake that religious bigots want us to make.
There are things that no body would ever normally agree too. But they are presumed to agree anyway to some form of logic. That the agreement is somewhere else that they never read.
I think the same standard that's applicable to google money tree should be applicable to marriage, LLC, and many other aspects of law.
And no wickedfire has the highest percapita income. I will have to resurrect my adswords to affiliate biz, which seems to be what wickedfire is really all about. Need more people working with me. MOAR. I love capitalism. Everyone else works. I make even more. And those people are even more profited because I pay them higher than Indonesian sallary. As long as I make more I pay more.
