With Matt Cutts and the Google spam team pretty much saying you need to nofollow everything out there...
When webmasters going to wise up and just start trading traffic between each other using traffic scripts like adult sites have been doing since the 90s?
Also, don't forget that traffic trading in adult works for a reason: People are UNSATISFIABLE when it comes to porn. They click and click and click until they find something cumworthy. These traffic trading scripts take advantage of that and just circle jerk traffic around ...but more traffic circulation does not equal more sales. It's more like they adapt to the fact that a typical porn user clicks around for ages before he jacks of...hopefully to something found on a 39,99$ membership site with 3 month in advance rebills.
On the traffic aspect, you're thinking in only terms of adult traffic.
I want to add more to this because I haven't anything better to do at the moment. Granted, it's all conjecture because I've never been a big website baller (although there were times when I was handling over a million uniques a month on my adult ventures, way back in the day).
I can still recall the time before Google was a household name. There was never a shortage of websites out there and it was common practice for every niche to get and build traffic using link exchanges. Some were from directories, classifieds, link lists, and things like that. Pretty much all sites were generating and trading traffic using similar methods.
Then, at some point, Google starting rising to fame and anyone who could turn on a monitor could achieve a #1 ranking. What I saw happen was that mainstream sites, who had a harder time getting and maintaining traffic trades, simply started focusing on Google, while adult sites kept doing what they were doing and Google traffic was just a bonus.
Fast forward to today, and now arranging traffic exchanges between mainstream sites is an out-of-this-world concept. If someone's site isn't ranking in Google, for whatever reason, they just dump it and start a new one with the same goal - to rank in Google. Meanwhile, adult sites are still carrying on as usual, some getting Google rankings, but many not caring because they can get so much traffic from other sources and traffic trades.
Granted, yes, adult sites, by their very nature, do have an easier time in this department. But, people seeking information/solutions aren't that much different from people looking for their fapping fix. 9 times out of 10 people aren't going to find the information they're looking for on the first site they visit from Google (hello 1st page listings dominated by ask.com, wikihow.com, about.com, ask.yahoo.com, etc). So there is plenty of surfing and clicking going on.
Only recently am I starting to notice content traffic exchanges popping up for mainstream sites (10+ years after the adult industry had already perfected these types of traffic exchanges), via "related posts" traffic exchanges and things of that nature.
The problem with these exchanges, so far (aside from them not being as fraud-proof as their more experienced, adult counterparts) is that mainstream webmasters have grown so dependent on Google, that they are deathly afraid of linking to and from anything, for fear of what Google will do.
So everyone just sits around, dancing each and every month to Google's next outrageous ranking requirement, while Google continues to increase its stranglehold over mainstream traffic by telling webmasters who they can and can't link to/from. All the mainstream sites bow before the Google alter, saying, "Yes, Master, we'll fix it right away! Please, disavow all my links!" While the adult markets and similar niches give Google the middle finger and go about business as usual.
Anyway, that's all my rambling for today.
I want to add more to this because I haven't anything better to do at the moment. Granted, it's all conjecture because I've never been a big website baller (although there were times when I was handling over a million uniques a month on my adult ventures, way back in the day).
I can still recall the time before Google was a household name. There was never a shortage of websites out there and it was common practice for every niche to get and build traffic using link exchanges. Some were from directories, classifieds, link lists, and things like that. Pretty much all sites were generating and trading traffic using similar methods.
Then, at some point, Google starting rising to fame and anyone who could turn on a monitor could achieve a #1 ranking. What I saw happen was that mainstream sites, who had a harder time getting and maintaining traffic trades, simply started focusing on Google, while adult sites kept doing what they were doing and Google traffic was just a bonus.
Fast forward to today, and now arranging traffic exchanges between mainstream sites is an out-of-this-world concept. If someone's site isn't ranking in Google, for whatever reason, they just dump it and start a new one with the same goal - to rank in Google. Meanwhile, adult sites are still carrying on as usual, some getting Google rankings, but many not caring because they can get so much traffic from other sources and traffic trades.
Granted, yes, adult sites, by their very nature, do have an easier time in this department. But, people seeking information/solutions aren't that much different from people looking for their fapping fix. 9 times out of 10 people aren't going to find the information they're looking for on the first site they visit from Google (hello 1st page listings dominated by ask.com, wikihow.com, about.com, ask.yahoo.com, etc). So there is plenty of surfing and clicking going on.
Only recently am I starting to notice content traffic exchanges popping up for mainstream sites (10+ years after the adult industry had already perfected these types of traffic exchanges), via "related posts" traffic exchanges and things of that nature.
The problem with these exchanges, so far (aside from them not being as fraud-proof as their more experienced, adult counterparts) is that mainstream webmasters have grown so dependent on Google, that they are deathly afraid of linking to and from anything, for fear of what Google will do.
So everyone just sits around, dancing each and every month to Google's next outrageous ranking requirement, while Google continues to increase its stranglehold over mainstream traffic by telling webmasters who they can and can't link to/from. All the mainstream sites bow before the Google alter, saying, "Yes, Master, we'll fix it right away! Please, disavow all my links!" While the adult markets and similar niches give Google the middle finger and go about business as usual.
Anyway, that's all my rambling for today.
lulz @ dukdukgo outranking bing and G...must be brand anchors for this to happen am I right?
Back to the analysis of what constitutes a "real editorial link" , what is that and who gets to decide?
I wish you would ramble more, and often. You are 100% correct about everything you said. This is one of those rare threads that make WF the best marketing forum in the industry.Anyway, that's all my rambling for today.
Yes, yes, exactly!!
The problem was in the beginning Google was so easy to rank, everyone forgot/dropped the other methods, and then all of a sudden it's gotten more difficult, but now they can't recall the other methods of getting traffic. In the ancient world there was a time before Google...
Social signals is where adult hurts the most and always will. Dat social sigma.
Social signals is where adult hurts the most and always will. Dat social sigma.
Unless you are just that mega weird guy and go around sharing RedTube and PornHub links all day on FB to your family and friends lol.
Mainstream is so much easier to market and "acceptable". I got out of adult when the recession hit the industry hard. Adult SEO is pretty easy IMO, you just need to know a bunch of GFY/adult webmaters with big sites.
I don't know if it's that people have forgotten these methods, rather than it's difficult to trade traffic with yourself.
To continue on this discussion:
I mean, to the vast, vast majority of mainstream sites out there, automating site-to-site traffic trades is a revolutionary concept, if only because no one else is doing it; it certainly isn't a new concept, by any means.
You can take an adult site, build it, and get it to over 1000 uv/day in two weeks or less, even with very little experience (granted that traffic isn't worth as much as most mainstream traffic, but that's not the point). However, it's infinitely more difficult to do that with mainstream sites.
Why? Because site-to-site traffic trading is so common, streamlined and automated in the adult industry that there's an endless sea of sites to trade with. Where as in mainstream niches, it's largely unheard of. Google, Yahoo, and Bing could close up shop tomorrow and while mainstream online markets crash overnight, the adult industry would barely feel it (maybe that's an exaggeration, but maybe not).
With as fucking insane as Google has become over the last three, short years, you would think people would be falling all over themselves to mainstream site-to-site trading in order to stabilize and safeguard their traffic and incomes, but it seems Google is working feverishly to discourage against that (Hell, even interlinking your sites is a big, common red flag in the eyes of Google. What does that tell you?) - and people just appear to sit back and lap it up.
But first, understand Google's desire for currency.Disregard Google, Acquire Currency