Fuck You Rick Santorum

The problem, Dresden, is that you *are* a fucking lunatic. It's literally impossible for you to take an objective view on anything because your opinions are absolutely skewed and one sided. This is literally where you are on the political spectrum

Tree hugging Liberal
|
|
|
|
Liberal
|
|
|
Moderate
|
|
|
Conservative
|
|
|
|
Santorum
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
go down about 10 more stories
|
|
|
you

There's no reasoning with you any more than I could talk calculus with a rabid german shepherd. And on top of it you're a retard at best.
 


I know I have posted the link to this Pdf before, but this is an invaluable resource outlining how US Politics really works and who really is pulling the strings.

The book was written by Carroll Quigley, a professor of History at Georgetown University. He lays out in a very dry academic manner who runs the world and how that came to be as well as the dynamics that allowed such a thing to occur.

This book is not written by a conspiracy theorist, but rather a guy that rubbed elbows with the "elite" and wished their role in shaping world events was less hidden.


http://www.tranquility.net/~rwinkel/911/TragedyAndHope.pdf
 
Without even reading the paper (I intend to btw, but I should probably be replying to emails and working right now lol), I know that definitely there are people who really pull the strings in this world. They come up over and over like recurring political themes in this age.

However, classifying them as all "jews", "niggers", or whatever else is simply ridiculous. It's simply an intellectual insult to tell me that a group of people who are in the VAST minority (under 5 million in the US i'm sure) wield such power, especially after undergoing a catastrophic holocaust that not only decimated their population, but their wealth. And even if it was true and they were secretly leading the entire globe by the nose, good for them. Obviously they'd have to be a LOT smarter than the rest of us.

I wonder what the likes of Dresden would have said 1 millenia ago while his people were enslaved in serfdom and a small percentage of whites sat on everyone else. Still jews? Give me a fucking break. I can't believe I even responded to that but yeah. :P

Anyway, I'll read the paper Yuma. Ty for sharing.
 
MisterSinister said:
The porn industry is a legal form of prostitution that is
harmful not only to the people directly involved, but also to millions
of Americans who struggle with an addiction that often leads to
depression, inability to have a healthy sex life in the real world, and
is cited in countless divorces. Additionally, the uncontrolled use of
pornographic images and videos on websites such as tumblr, myspace,
craigslist, and even wikipedia allow children to have access to this
material because those sites slip through parental control settings and
they don't put enough resources into policing their own sites. Faith
aside, the government does have a responsibility to control how this
material is accessed and by whom. Why should we support fighting things
like big tobacco but not fight something that numerous studies have
shown to cause a lot of much more harmful physical, psychological,
emotional,...and yes; spritiual issues. This initiative alone by
Santorum, will play a large factor in my voting decision. I support
pulling back hard on the reigns of pornography. This is not a
"Christian problem" this is a human problem.
Click to expand...

lolol Yeah, no one in the world uses porn as a healthy release, ever.

People are responsible for themselves. Who are you, or the government for that matter, to tell someone that they should not have the right to look at porno if they want? "Pulling back hard on the reigns of pornography" (lol) would just make it go underground, not disappear and billions of dollars would be wasted in the process.

Those problems do exist. In fact, I have someone in my (not immediate) family who has a well known porn addiction. Like drug addicts, addiction problems need to be treated like the disease they are and not by outlawing whatever people are addicted to.
 
Remember for the GOP, you finish in 2nd before you finish in 1st. Santorum could well be the primary winner in 2016 provided Mittens loses.
 
MisterSinister said:
I used to think this but $XX million is a hell of a lot to spend on a puppet.
Click to expand...

$XX Million is a lot less than the $700 Million Romney has been dishing out over the years for this election. I also believe RS is in this to make Romney look more on the lines of "American" views.
 
MisterSinister said:
The problem, Dresden, is that you *are* a fucking lunatic. It's literally impossible for you to take an objective view on anything because your opinions are absolutely skewed and one sided. This is literally where you are on the political spectrum

Tree hugging Liberal
|
|
|
|
Liberal
|
|
|
Moderate
|
|
|
Conservative
|
|
|
|
Santorum
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
go down about 10 more stories
|
|
|
you

There's no reasoning with you any more than I could talk calculus with a rabid german shepherd. And on top of it you're a retard at best.
Click to expand...

LuLz @ this guy... 10 stories down eh? Do remember, hundreds of millions have believed in what I believe in - so I'm a lunatic for believing in the things I do which has been around for centuries all the while your little teeny bopper, multiculturalist "lets be democratic and act like the world police and care for everyone except our own country" government thoughts, that have existed only... 40 years are right?

So what thoughts are more 'right', one that would believe in taking care of its own country first or trying to take care of others and not giving a shit about our own? Back to the thread in question, Ron Paul is the only man who could deliver but the "powers that be" wont allow it. It has nothing to do with the masses or majority vote, because the people would not vote for this scumbag or obama, ever. Obviously, you're anything but a nationalist, so you probably don't give a shit nor do i expect you to understand.

But you are right on being down there. I'm so far right I'm almost left again :-)

/LuLz
 
Dresden14 said:
LuLz @ this guy... 10 stories down eh? Do remember, hundreds of millions have believed in what I believe in - so I'm a lunatic for believing in the things I do which has been around for centuries all the while your little teeny bopper, multiculturalist "lets be democratic and act like the world police and care for everyone except our own country" government thoughts, that have existed only... 40 years are right?

So what thoughts are more 'right', one that would believe in taking care of its own country first or trying to take care of others and not giving a shit about our own? Back to the thread in question, Ron Paul is the only man who could deliver but the "powers that be" wont allow it. It has nothing to do with the masses or majority vote, because the people would not vote for this scumbag or obama, ever. Obviously, you're anything but a nationalist, so you probably don't give a shit nor do i expect you to understand.

But you are right on being down there. I'm so far right I'm almost left again :-)

/LuLz
Click to expand...

Ok, I can't believe I'm actually responding but here we go.

1. Right.. I'm not nationalist. Rofl. This is the same argument republicans have been putting forth since the dawn of time to anyone that disagrees with their *ridiculous* world view. I love my country buddy, but I'm not xenophobic. As far as I'm concerned, look around and you'll see the entire planet is being globalized. It'd be unrealistic to see this in any other way. That's also how I operate my business.

2. Hundreds of millions? Give me a break. Out of 350 million americans, maybe 5% are as right winged as you. Otherwise we'd have some nazi idiot in power. Instead we have a half negro.

3. Am I multiculturalist? Not really. I'm not racist, I'm realistic. I've made more money off people all over the world and from different cultures than I care to compute. Why on earth would I discriminate? Bring on the masses, I got some ebooks that will uplift them.

4. I already made a thread about Ron Paul. He'd be my 100% ideal candidate but despite the funding he got, he his cooky values did not connect with the majority of people. That's his fault. I warned ya'll.

5. Don't call me a teeny bopper. I'm probably older than you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: learningcurve
MisterSinister said:
If you watch porn, then you (1) lack self-control, (2) are addicted to porn, (3) lack sufficient morals, (4) have too much time on your hands, AND/OR (5) haven't learned about the inherent dignity of the human person. Watching porn tears away at the soul and is morally illicit. It encourages and instills a disordered understanding of human sexuality. Porn takes the sacred act of sex and turns it into garbage for you to eat. The type of food you eat affects your body. The content you watch affects your soul.
The darkness and addiction you're experiencing can be turned to light and self-control. I feel obligated to inform you of the truth. It's up to you whether you choose to accept it.
Click to expand...

says the guy who was just "trippin balls" the other night.
 
If you bothered to read the article + comments you'd see that I ripped that right off the website.

Watch porn, idgaf. Just don't push your beliefs on me because....idgaf.
 
Ron Paul is the man.

317.jpg

 
MisterSinister said:
Ok, I can't believe I'm actually responding but here we go.


4. I already made a thread about Ron Paul. He'd be my 100% ideal candidate but despite the funding he got, he his cooky values did not connect with the majority of people. That's his fault. I warned ya'll.

He is your ideal candidate but you think he has cooky values? :rasta:
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom