Black teens attack white man because they were bored, surprising.



spending the tax money of the victims family on rehabilitation for the poor kids.

ethical

Would you rather spend the tax money locking people up for eternal damnation?

Prisons shouldn't be about the victims family's in the first place. Prisons should be about removing dangerous people from society until they can be re-entered, once rehabilitated.

That seems to have gone out the window though. Prison seems to be the place where society can live out its revenge fantasies now.

we can discuss prison all you want when you find a quote of me justifying or even acknowledging prison as a necessary and/or reasonable form of punishment/rehab/treatment. go fuck your ad hominem all over someone else. its not even correct because i dont hold the belief you imply.
 
I once had a friend back in High School, indian, nicest guy in the world would never hurt a fly. Walking home from school one day was jumped on by a pack of 10-15 ghetto black kids who thought it would be fun to beat up on a defenseless kid (mind you most non-ghetto black people don't like ghetto trash either). Came back to school in a week all bruised and eyes blood shot red.

The thing is the system always takes their side. Damn it other people can have messed up lives as well not just blacks. :/
 
Death penalty all of them..
They will never contribute to society, just make it worse for the people living in it.
99% chance they are on welfare when they get older, get put back in jail again, etc.
 
So you compare an extremist lunatic to a general occurences of 'urban youth' attacking randoms?

I was replying to a comment about the media. Going by FBI numbers, there are nearly 20 violent "hate crimes" EVERY DAY. Very few receive wall to wall national media coverage, even when they have to do with people being killed.

27 hate crime homicides against homos in 2010. Nobody felt a need to make a thread on here about any of them, even though this is the gay webmaster forum and all.





Is it still racist if it is statistical data that suggests that black youths deserve a reputation of a higher rate of random acts of black on white crime than all the reverse?

Statistical data also says that 90% of homicides are committed by males, but nobody points that out on here, and if they did some would rightly or wrongly assume that they were a radical feminist.

Statistically speaking, because of age and gender the average wickedfire user would pose more of a danger to society than the average American.

Slide20.JPG
 
Statistically speaking, because of age and gender the average wickedfire user would pose more of a danger to society than the average American.


'Hate crime' is a bullshit term and is stupid as mandatory minimum sentences.

'Hate crime' should just be 'crime'. How do prosecutors know a offenders state of mind when the crime was committed. How does that make the crime worse? Did the victim suffer more harm to property or person because of the persons state of mind? If the crime was more savage then increase the punishment based off that.

If I'm beat up by a white man we call it assault.
If my black/homosexual friend is beat up by a white man we call it a hate crime.

Did I get beat up any less? Are my injuries some how less severe based off the attackers state of mind?


And yes statistically the average wickedfire user is more of a threat to society for the very statistical reasons you listed.

Your demographic (male 18-35) is so broad though than you'll have trouble making any sort of meaningful conclusions.....But yes what you've said is technically accurate.

You should take the time and segment the population youve chosen (male) into further sub-groups and see what you find.

Race, economics, education, prior convictions, etc etc. what you find probably won't surprise you at all that much...

.... except for the amount of how much everyone is too ashamed/embarrassed to point them out. Stats do not feel political correctness however and are mearly data points.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ly2 from WF
Edit: for what it's worth I don't just accept these stereotypes as fact based only on gender and race alone. That is Drseden talk. Rather these statistics exist as a product of things we could change if they/we would. But you can't solve any problems by refusing to admit there are problems at all. And that is what political correctness has done to us. So let's keep this cycle going
 
Your demographic (male 18-35) is so broad though than you'll have trouble making any sort of meaningful conclusions

That demographic is about 32 million, whereas blacks are 40 million..

You should take the time and segment the population youve chosen (male) into further sub-groups and see what you find.

Mr. Professor, why was this not asked for in any of the "black people" threads?

Over half of blacks are over age 35, half are female, 10% are upper middle class or higher, thousands of them live in Utah, etc.


Race, economics, education, prior convictions, etc etc. what you find probably won't surprise you at all that much...

.... except for the amount of how much everyone is too ashamed/embarrassed to point them out.

They are pointed out and studied every day in the sociology and criminology fields. Black leaders have been pointing out their own crime rates for years, but the media doesn't give them much coverage when they do this.

I don't just accept these stereotypes as fact based only on

A "stereotype" was printing press equipment in the 1800s that made exact duplicates. 2 out of 3 black males never go to prison and only a small percent commit homicide. Technically speaking, it only takes one black person not liking rap music to make that stereotype untrue.
 
I wonder how many people would get upset if JEWS, for instance were spoken about in the same manner as black people are on this forum ?
 
That demographic is about 32 million, whereas blacks are 40 million..



Mr. Professor, why was this not asked for in any of the "black people" threads?

Over half of blacks are over age 35, half are female, 10% are upper middle class or higher, thousands of them live in Utah, etc.




They are pointed out and studied every day in the sociology and criminology fields. Black leaders have been pointing out their own crime rates for years, but the media doesn't give them much coverage when they do this.



A "stereotype" was printing press equipment in the 1800s that made exact duplicates. 2 out of 3 black males never go to prison and only a small percent commit homicide. Technically speaking, it only takes one black person not liking rap music to make that stereotype untrue.


You're talking 'blacks' I was/am talking "Yes, that is stereotypical behavior for urban poor young black men."

Btw do you know how absurdly high it is to have 33% of your demographic to have ANY jail time? Lol

I have no desire to debate what stereotype means with you. But i hardly think anyone has your definintion in mind when they use the term. There are of course exceptions to stereotypes. Not all Asians are good at math. Not all webmasters are gay. But stereotypes do exist in reality.
 
I have no desire to debate what stereotype means with you. But i hardly think anyone has your definintion in mind when they use the term. There are of course exceptions to stereotypes. Not all Asians are good at math. Not all webmasters are gay. But stereotypes do exist in reality.

I don't think many would define a "true" one as meaning it applies to less than 50% of a group.


"stereotype definition" at top of google : "A widely held but fixed and oversimplified image or idea of a particular type of person or thing."

To oversimplify is "to simplify to such an extent as to bring about distortion, misunderstanding, or error"


Stereotyping is considered a fallacy..

Fallacies List - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
 
Explain please

He's pointing out that there are plenty of threads/posts about the "Jews control the media", "Jews control the central banks", "Jews run the US" and we even have at least one self-described Nazi on the forum, and yet the owner Jon (who is 120% Jewish) has repeatedly said he's not censoring the shit. So if the owner (and our Jewish overlord) doesn't care about antisemitism on his own site, why would he care about threads trashing blacks, arabs, mexicans, Irish, puppies, Kazakhs or anything else?

There are outspoken people on this forum that will call you on your shit no matter what you post, so when people post negative shit about blacks for instance, other members will step in and call the white man the devil and the perpetrator of all evil. Then invariably crime stats will be posted, which will then turn to discussion of IQ and finally devolve into a discussion of dick size. That is the natural progression of most discussions on Wickedfire.

tldr; if you are easily offended by people talking shit about you, your mother, your race, your sexuality or anything else that you hold near and dear, then this might not be the place for you.

I'm pretty sure all of this is in the rules thread, but honestly I've been here for over 5 years and I've never read the rules so I could be wrong.