Yep, and nobody loses money. Everyone is getting rich, all you have to do is get in now!between the stock market, bitcoins, internet marketing, and housing market ppl are making shiloads of money.
Yep, and nobody loses money. Everyone is getting rich, all you have to do is get in now!between the stock market, bitcoins, internet marketing, and housing market ppl are making shiloads of money.
Why do BTC fans get so upset when people ask basic, due diligence, fundamentals oriented questions?Goddamnit, you're an idiot, I quit.
Honest question: doesn't this insane price volatility actually work against the goal of merchant adoption of bitcoins? If you were trying to sell anything right now while accepting bitcoins you'd basically have to rig up a live pricing system based on the current trading price of the coins so you don't end up getting fucked right?
Goddamnit, you're an idiot, I quit.
Goddamnit, you're an idiot, I quit.
This is the kind of sheeple mentality which I despise. Having absolute conviction in something when you probably don't know any more than the next man.between the stock market, bitcoins, internet marketing, and housing market ppl are making shiloads of money. 9-5ers are missing out on the greatest wealth boom in human history (unless your a lawyer or CEO then stick with it lol).
I agree with dchuk. If a merchant has to constantly change their pricing live, it'll not be worth the headache. People will have to wait till the currency stops fluctuating in order to price out correctly their own services. I guess once hardcore assets get tied to this, then the price will stabilize. I didn't realize the value of a bitcoin was dependent on the current stock price.
Why would a buyer pay in bitcoins when the value is skyrocketing?
Good question
Why would a seller accept bitcoins when the value could suddenly plummet?
can
Why do BTC fans get so upset when people ask basic, due diligence, fundamentals oriented questions?
Why would anyone want to trade in bitcoins when the value is so unstable?
The seller has no risk if he can convert it instantly into BTC, the buyer is OK with paying for items at the current price BTC is at... same thing as selling it to an exchange, getting the cash, and using that cash to buy the very same item from the seller.
Why would a buyer pay in bitcoins when the value is skyrocketing?
Good question
Why would a seller accept bitcoins when the value could suddenly plummet?
It doesn't matter if they can convert it instantly into USD, which they can
Because I already fucking answered it. And its been answered at least 3 times on wickedfire.
Merchants want to accept bitcoins because it saves them processing fees and prevents chargeback and fraud. They can use a payment processor and have no currency risk.
Buyers want to pay in bitcoins because goods are cheaper (when the merchant passes on a portion of their savings) and they get privacy from cc companies. They can buy bitcoins and pay instantly and have no currency risk. Or they can hold bitcoins, and replenish whenever they buy goods using them, and not care about missing out if their holdings go up in value.
Without fail someone will bring this up again in the next few days.
you can pay rent
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=73712.0
![]()
from March 24, 2012.
This was a while ago. Have read about users buying cars and paying rent more and more with BTC.
http://mashable.com/2013/03/22/house-bitcoins/
They'd also have to be constantly cashing out in case of a price drop which defeats the purpose of converting your fiat currency.
Edit: Holy shit I agree with dchuk on something.
A merchant saving a 3% or so credit card transaction fee is kind of pointless if there's a risk of the value of the coins dropping 10%+ any given day (which is basically the flipside of the current boom in the pricing of the coins right now, so it's not outside the realm of possibility).
I wouldn't want to be running a SaaS where people sign up to it at a bitcoin price of say $200 and then when the next billing date comes around, bitcoins are valued at $100. I'd either have to charge them twice as much (which consumers aren't going to be cool with at all, variable automated pricing just isn't acceptable), or eat half the revenue.
Someone correct me if I'm wrong here, didn't get a lot of sleep last night...I think my logic is sound though.