Arconis - scammer, fraud, cheat.

919087045656
8056791111

these are the allegedly the phone numbers of Paul Arjun, the owner of

Beneficiary Name Arjjun Film Factory
Beneficiary IFSC Code UTIB0000137
Beneficiary Account Number / Credit Card Number 915020004368875
Bank Name AXIS BANK

But i'm not too sure if Paul Arjun is the real name of this scammer.
 


Lol.. the cameron@ email address above is mine, guys.. please ignore that one until mods remove it from jorarulit's post.

Thanks
 
Alright so i got my refund (not actually a refund but arconis sent me money to my paypal, he might as well file a claim next day and get it back, no trust for this dude)
 
We have a more likely sounding identity.

The chat log posted on [Buying] Blogpost on PR2+ Travel websites gives us a few sites, a key one being:

Know About Android New Apps

Whois shows
Paul Russell
Popularity Rank
34A Sashi Bhushan Dey Street
Kolkata
WB
700012
IN
+91.8653843837
pr.linkmanager@gmail.com (also goes by Lalit, Maria, Aaron, Naresh, Sukrat, Ritu, and some more)

This Popularity Rank Web Riser India at Website Informer identifies Popularity Rank as Web Riser India (although has a different address and phone). They own Worldclassednews.com (where the whois identifies as the same company) and have a website here: SEO Company India

Popularity Rank also leads us to this Elance profile: https://www.elance.com/s/rdworldseo/ naming 'Ripan Das'. A google of the username in the URL (rdworldseo) turns up this, this time half calling themselves Rohan Das: https://forums.digitalpoint.com/threads/providing-quality-blogpost-services-for-all-niche.2611257/

Finally, a search of the Skype username 'dasripan' results in this twitter account, with photo:

https://twitter.com/dasripan

May be off base, but assuming that's his sites linked in the WaFo thread, fairly sure I'm not.

There's a fair few more URLs owned by him, but most are just shitty blogfarm domains, and I'm too sleep deprived at the moment. One other site of interest is
 
How about the admin/mods make it a rule that all new editorial service providers need to provide upfront completed work before receiving payment.

This rule applies continuously until they gathered X amount of iTraders from their editorial service. The X amount of iTraders needs to come from members with Y amount of iTraders.
 
SeoReborn said:
How about the admin/mods make it a rule that all new editorial service providers need to provide upfront completed work before receiving payment.

This rule applies continuously until they gathered X amount of iTraders from their editorial service. The X amount of iTraders needs to come from members with Y amount of iTraders.
Click to expand...
Might work, but what about 'old' members such as ChristopherT, with 50+ itraders, that is out of the blue a new editorial service provider?
 
Arconis has informed me that he has refunded a few people and is delivering goods to a few others. If you have unresolved issues with him, pm me.
 
diesel1 said:
Might work, but what about 'old' members such as ChristopherT, with 50+ itraders, that is out of the blue a new editorial service provider?
Click to expand...

Yes but if you look, not all those itraders belong to the editorial service. Looks like he only has maybe 6 positive itraders for the editorial.

What I am saying is set the threshold of maybe 10-20 itraders gathered for the editorial (not other services), before they are allowed to take payment upfront. The members that provide the positive itrader should have Y itraders themselves for it to count. Let slook at ChristopherT's case. And say we set Y as 10. He would only have 3 positive itraders (the other 3 has member itrader < 10) that would count. So even if we have set the lower threshold of 10 qualifying itraders, he would still not qualify to accept payment upfront.

Even old wicked members needs to abide by this rule when it comes to providing an editorial service, regardless of the previous amount of iTraders they have gathered from their other services.
 
SeoReborn said:
Yes but if you look, not all those itraders belong to the editorial service. Looks like he only has maybe 6 positive itraders for the editorial.

What I am saying is set the threshold of maybe 10-20 itraders gathered for the editorial (not other services), before they are allowed to take payment upfront. The members that provide the positive itrader should have Y itraders themselves for it to count. Let slook at ChristopherT's case. And say we set Y as 10. He would only have 3 positive itraders (the other 3 has member itrader < 10) that would count. So even if we have set the lower threshold of 10 qualifying itraders, he would still not qualify to accept payment upfront.

Even old wicked members needs to abide by this rule when it comes to providing an editorial service, regardless of the previous amount of iTraders they have gathered from their other services.
Click to expand...
Ok, this can work

Also include Q&A services
 
Brandon you are speaking a bit too soon.

I still have not been refunded.

If you have been refunded, please private message me the paypal account which sent you the 'refund'. This is extremely important.

Thanks,

Cameron
 
I have been sent a payment from a different paypal account for the full amount of the refund due to me. The paypal address which sent the payment matches the one which refunded Jorarulit so the payments are unlikely to be from hacked accounts. So for me, this is mostly a closed case. It's going to take 180 days for this case to close fully though.. lol.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom