To the OP: I assume you're a local so you know far more than me.
I've been living in HK for the last couple of months and I'll stay here until the end of the year. One of the things I've realized is that not everything in HK is as laissez-faire as I thought. Biggest example is property.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but in HK the government owns all the land by default, and it only auctions small fractions of it to private developers. But a developer can't just buy a piece of land if they feel like it, and build a skyscraper.
I totally agree with that kind of thing, especially in a city like HK where space is so limited and thus it has to be managed very well. But it differs quite a bit from other capitalist countries where the majority of the land is private and it can be freely sold and it most cases developed without a lot of hassle.
There also seem to be quite a few monopolies here. Supermarkets are all owned basically by the same person and there's a cartel type of agreement to keep the prices high. This is of course a result of having a very laissez-faire approach, but IMO it's an example of when more government is better than less government.