Shawn...wouldn't it just be that much easier to just prohibit beer/alcohol?
didnt he also get his shitty fake id jacked by a bouncer? haha
Well, then, let's see...It would be easy, but I don't think something that is easy for us necessarily translates into being a positive for our exhibitors who wish to provide drinks to attendees.
Let's say 100x 19-20 year olds. It's more realistic and less like a fieldtrip.Well, then, let's see...
Let's say there are 100 16-year-olds that want to buy a full pass. 21-16=5. 5 * 100 * 995 = $497,500 that's not reaped because you want to hold 5-10 advertisers' attention.
Naturally, I don't know how much you charge for an advertiser, but I can't imagine it's more than $10,000. You do the math.
If just one exhibitor is giving away beer, that's enough to make it an issue for us.
If I recall correctly, we started doing this last year in Miami.
People will figure out ways to try and beat it, and apparently some have.
Maybe it wasn't a good idea to brag about it, because now we'll just clamp down more.
The age limitation is retarded for the conference alone. The parties at night have bouncers and rightfully so. If advertisers can't wait until the damn parties at night to give beer to people, that's pretty sad. Banning all affiliates under 21 from going to the summit just because one or two vendors has free beer at noon is ridiculous. Pay an extra person or something to stand at the booth and check ID's of people wanting beer that look under 25. It'll be worth it for the number of tickets you'll sell to guys under 21.
how about an pink color badge for those under 21?
how about an pink color badge for those under 21?
Best Idea Ever. I wonder why Shawn couldn't come up with something like that.
Best Idea Ever. I wonder why Shawn couldn't come up with something like that.
Oh you're right, my bad.That idea is too practical. We need irrational ideas, like banning everyone under 21.