Is this the beginning of the end for the bit coin?
From the way it's phrased, it just means that the banks themselves can't deal with crypto, for example using it as an investment vehicle. It doesn't say anything about banks being blocked from wiring money to exchanges if customers choose to do that through online banking like they currently do.
If you look at some of the quotes you can also tell that not much research was done prior to this, ex "no intrinsic value" (same as fiat) and "virtual money is not currency" (so I should withdraw all the virtual fiat from my bank account?). Sounds like they just read a couple wikipedia articles, panicked, and slapped down some regulation, so in the future when they realize they were wrong the regulation could easily change to be even more favorable.
I'm planning to hold. If it dips under 700 on Coinbase I'll pick up some more, but doubt that will happen.
Coindesk: "While the central bank is telling the nation’s financial institutions not to deal with bitcoin, it said individuals are free to buy, sell and use the cryptocurrency, if they wish, but they must take on the risk themselves."
So this is almost irrelevant. They just don't want banks speculating/gambling with customers' money in something that is clearly a very high-risk investment. That's pretty reasonable. If anything, this will help to stabilize the price and encourage more people to use bitcoin.
Coinbase has a vested interest in speculating the move is irrelevant. This single move squashes the idea of full integration of bitcoin (at least in china). So even if BTC is widely accepted, it will never be allowed to reach its full potential (at least in china). And that is not speculation or irrelevant.
definitely two perspectives to have here. the short-term and long-term effects. short-term? purely from a trader/speculator perspective, it's the first time i did a "daytrade thingy". sold some while it was crashing and bought them all back at a lower price. it's already back to over 1k so i made a few extra coins :xmas-smiley-016: so any big news like that you'd wanna consider what to do.
long-term effects? interesting to see what it does in china, if any. fwiw, seeing this about india starting to get involved. population over 1.2 billion ppl. (china has 1.35 bil) india with lot's of IT/techies who're into this sort of stuff:
Bitcoin is gaining currency in India and RBI is watching | Firstpost
bitcoins not gonna go away easily for sure.
like i said - "starting to get involved". not nearly as involved like in china..not yet that is...According to enthusiasts who follow every twist and turn in the fast-evolving Bitcoin story, there is a 50,000-strong Bitcoin community in the country, with at least 30,000 of them owning the virtual currency and having an online digital wallet for storing it.30,000 out of 1.2 billion you say? Fuck they're quick!
China's central bank is feeling threatened by bitcoins. This will either end very well or very bad.
My money is on the side with the tanks and nuclear weapons.
Coinbase has a vested interest in speculating the move is irrelevant. This single move squashes the idea of full integration of bitcoin (at least in china). So even if BTC is widely accepted, it will never be allowed to reach its full potential (at least in china). And that is not speculation or irrelevant.
Agreed when you have something physical to attack. Tanks and nukes cant touch something that is virtual.
Everything virtual depends on something physical.