Chopper Gunner Indiscretion: Innocent People Hammered With 30mm Rounds

I take it you really can't come up with anything solid to back up your earlier line of reasoning. And so now you switched into the weaseling out mode.

Don't worry, bro, although I usually enjoy owning people and then rubbing it in their faces, this thread wasn't an attempt to do that.

/thread

When you say shit like you would feel more comfortable on a plane full of muslims, and then say you would feel more comfortable in a room full of your own, well it just becomes apparent that you're just trolling. Good luck with that.
 


I take it you really can't come up with anything solid to back up your earlier line of reasoning. And so now you switched into the weaseling out mode.

Don't worry, bro, although I usually enjoy owning people and then rubbing it in their faces, this thread wasn't an attempt to do that.

/thread


dude i dont think anyone knows what ur arguing... ur arguing that Islam is a religion of peace (whatever that means)? If so, then no, it's not, it's a religion filled with violence just like christiniaty and a bunch of other cults.

i think you were saying that civilians in iraq aren't responsible for attacks/obviously can't control extremists. yah no shit. but i'm sorry but i dont give a fuck when religious ppl die. if you have any sort of access to the internet and are still religious you can go jump a cliff and kill yourself to spare your children the bullshit.

ummm but the people in this video had aks and rpgs and were in the most violent neighborhood during the surge. the apache was responding to calls from infantry blocks away from where the guys with rpgs were. no one else was on the street in this neighborhood except these guys so i dunno why you all of a sudden started claiming that Muslims civilians dont have control over extremists. completely off topic and pointless topic to discuss. no one is commiting or suggesting genocide against muslims so just stfu

guess what motherfucker? ak47s and rpgs kill americans. 30 seconds and you have a few american troops dead. it doesnt take a 2 hour battle to waste a few american soldiers. all it takes is guys with ak47 and rpgs to be in commission. mmk?

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZuSJEbc5-lQ&feature=related"]YouTube- AK-47 Vs. Cop[/ame]

yah lets just try to apprehend these rpg guys with flowers. i'm sure they're not going to open fire when they see troops coming. go look at other engagements in iraq dumbfuck
 
When you say shit like you would feel more comfortable on a plane full of muslims
I never said I would feel more comfortable on a plane full of Muslims. I said it's probably a safer place. Feel free to scroll up and re-read my post a few times, until it sinks in.

Do planes full of Muslims get blown up more often than planes full of Christians?

No?

Well, that's why your example is total shit. And that's what I pointed out.

just trolling
I'm trolling, my credibility is ruined, ... blah blah... it's all good as long as you don't actually have to admit that you backed yourself into a corner. Right?
 
I never said I would feel more comfortable in a plane full of Muslims. I said it's probably a safer place. Feel free to scroll up and re-read my post a few times, until it sinks in.

Do planes full of Muslims get blown up more often than planes full of Christians?

No?

Well, that's why your example is total shit. And that's what I pointed out.



I'm trolling, my credibility is ruined, ... blah blah... it's all good as long as you don't actually have to admit that you backed yourself into a corner. Right?

just stop posting. why are you posting random retarded hyothetical scenarios with muslims or whatever.

and fuckkk no if i was a white guy in a plane full of muslims in a magical anarchy country, i would gtfo cause if it was anarchy i can almost guaruntee it someone with

ISLAMIC INDOCTRINATION would attack me.

in reality, we don't live in anarchy, so most humans, Muslim or not aren't going to risk their lives to ruin someone elses. but Islam makes it a little easier to do so, since it promises you rewards for jihad

now stfu i just owned you

ur so fucking stupid. instead of the plane example (an area subject to obvious law enforcement when it lands), u should use the "lawless territory" in some middle east country with no punishments or law enforcement. u feel safe there as a white non-Muslim person brahmeister? no? i didnt think so
 
i think you were saying that civilians in iraq aren't responsible for attacks/obviously can't control extremists. yah no shit.

Well, tell that to Unarmed Gunman. He seems to think the civilians over there are responsible and need to take some sort of action to keep the terrorists in check.

Yet, he can't even explain how that would be possible given that an Iraqi with a weapon is automatically assumed to be an insurgent.

The rest of your post is irrelevant, at least when it comes to the point I'm making.
 
why are you posting random retarded hyothetical scenarios with muslims or whatever.

I am posting random hypothetical scenarios? Dammit, you are one dumb motherfucker.
Go back, and re-read the thread and see that I'm actually against talking hypothetically about what could or should be done by people that can't realistically do shit.
 
Well, tell that to Unarmed Gunman. He seems to think the civilians over there are responsible and need to take some sort of action to keep the terrorists in check.

Yet, he can't even explain how that would be possible given that an Iraqi with a weapon is automatically assumed to be an insurgent.

The rest of your post is irrelevant, at least when it comes to the point I'm making.

you're right and ill stop calling u a dumbass but please stop claiming Islam is a religion of peace
 
I never said I would feel more comfortable on a plane full of Muslims. I said it's probably a safer place. Feel free to scroll up and re-read my post a few times, until it sinks in.

Do planes full of Muslims get blown up more often than planes full of Christians?

No?

Well, that's why your example is total shit. And that's what I pointed out.

I'm trolling, my credibility is ruined, ... blah blah... it's all good as long as you don't actually have to admit that you backed yourself into a corner. Right?

Fine I'm bored so I'll play your game. A few questions before I disassemble you.

Why is it that Christians can keep their nutcases in line better than Muslims can?

Islam is a religion of peace according to you (which is factually incorrect), so why are so many people killed in the name of such a peaceful religion?

Have you ever studied the Qu'ran?
 
Fine I'm bored so I'll play your game. A few questions before I disassemble you.
You are not bored, you are owned. (strictly by your own doing I might add)
Disassemble me by explaining to me what I've been asking you to do without going on tangents? Can't do that?

Why is it that Christians can keep their nutcases in line better than Muslims can?
Because local police, state police, FBI, and ATF have budgets much greater than that of law enforcement agencies in other countries. They are much better equipped and have more resources to track down various "elements", infiltrate sects, and prevent most of the shit that could be happening.

Islam is a religion of peace according to you (which is factually incorrect), so why are so many people killed in the name of such a peaceful religion?
It's a religion of peace in the same sense as Christianity is a religion of "turn the other cheek" people. It's not more or less violent than Christianity. And if you study world history, you'll see that a lot more people have been killed in the name of Jesus Christ, than in the name of all other deities combined.

So when people try to present Islam as somehow inherently violent religion, I call bullshit. Either all of them are inherently violent or all of them are religions of peace, abused by those who claim to follow them.

Have you ever studied the Qu'ran?
Nope. And have no plans of doing so. Let me guess, your next response would be to say how much more you know about it. Right? And as a result, your previous illogical conclusions should somehow all start to make sense?
 
you're right and ill stop calling u a dumbass but please stop claiming Islam is a religion of peace

Read my post just above.
 
All collectivist arguments (for or against) are incapable of being more a rough generalizations, particularly when we talk about human action.
 
Nope. And have no plans of doing so. Let me guess, your next response would be to say how much more you know about it. Right? And as a result, your previous illogical conclusions should somehow all start to make sense?

So you've never even read the Qu'ran, and yet you are attempting to call it a religion of peace? You = owned yourself.

Here, I'll leave this here for you. Give it a read sometime if you'd ever like to have an opinion on it that's worth a fuck:

koranshit.jpg


Feel free to come back when you can speak intelligently about the subject. You can bring your bleeding heart, white guilt along with you, and I'll try to cure you of that too. Or, stay ignorant - I hear that's quite blissful.
 
Feel free to come back when you can speak intelligently about the subject.

Still no response on how the civilians are actually supposed to do what you say they should have done?
 
That's possibly the dumbest statement I've ever heard. Congratulations on sounding like a total moron!

Are you saying more people in the world were killed by Muslims than by Christians?
 
Are you saying more people in the world were killed by Muslims than by Christians?

Are you saying more people in the world were killed by Muslims than by Christians in the name of their religion?

That's an important piece of context to that question.
 
That's an important piece of context to that question.

Well, that can be argued whether that makes a difference or not.
But even if you only think of instanced when Christianity was used to encourage killing of others, you'll still end up with it being the clear leader.

Almost every battle or act of aggression committed by Christians is justified by saying "God is with us".

While it's not the same as saying "God wants us to kill them" (with plenty of instances of Christians doing that), it's simply a matter of how much "encouragement" is required to get the job done.

In Christianity it seems to be done by proxy quite a lot. "Got hates ..." + "I'm killing ..." = therefore I'm doing God's work and God is on my side.

You really can't claim that Christianity is inherently good while Islam is inherently evil. Yet, that seems to be the main point of many people.

Both get perverted and used to promote agendas.
 
I've already answered it here, but as you've already admitted - you don't read much.
You didn't answer shit. What you did was (possibly) invent some unverifiable expertise on your part. I argue based on logic specifically for that reason, so there is no need to claim any superior knowledge of the topic.

You can beat your self on the chest all day long and claim that you spent 150 years studying Islam, but that won't mean shit.

It's like saying 2+2=3 and when you get called on your bullshit, respond by saying that you have a phd in math, and therefore all your bullshit must somehow make sense.

Next thing you know, it will turn out that you've been fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan since 2001. And before that, you were involved with covert ops working for the CIA, deployed in the Middle East.

So you must have some super-duper knowledge of the Muslim mindset, which you can't really explain, but since you are such a great authority on the subject, then I should just accept your fallacies.

Right?

Well, tell that to Unarmed Gunman. He seems to think the civilians over there are responsible and need to take some sort of action to keep the terrorists in check.

Yet, he can't even explain how that would be possible given that an Iraqi with a weapon is automatically assumed to be an insurgent.
This is the only thing you need to explain. If you can't do that (and we all know you can't) then simply gtfo.