I had no idea there were so many CEO/Founders here. Can we get a full list somewhere not in the middle of a thread?
I had no idea there were so many CEO/Founders here. Can we get a full list somewhere not in the middle of a thread?
Since advaliant responded now, I'll give us a 50% chance of getting one more response from any of those mentioned above. 0.0001% of any more than that one.Good responses so far. How about answers from Affiliate.com, HydraNetwork, Neverblue, Advaliant, CX Digital, Azoogle and the other big guys?
We want to know your policy on this as well. Don't chicken out. Speak up.
I wont answer for all networks but in most standard agreements it will state that your information will be given up for a subpoena or if you violated any third parties rights.
In the context of the FTC coming knocking, i would guess that any .network will eventually give your information to them either willingly or by force.
The best way to avoid that is to play by the rules. In our world the FTC will enforce whats called section 5 of their code which relates to misleading and false advertisements. You want to ensure that your ads are not false or misleading. You cant say you will lose 40lbs in a week if there is no documentation proving it. Without proof that Becky exists the (insertnamehereweightlossblog.com) technique could be considered misleading.
Also if you think the FTC is working on something that has gotten big in the past two months you are probably very wrong. The FTC investigates for a long time before they do anything, and it usually takes them years to identify something to investigate. Look at how long ringtones ran, or debt consolidation companies, enron, travel clubs, etc...
For affiliates make sure you are not misleading or being false to consumers. It is OK to use logos of news outlets if the product was featured on it, its OK to set up your own review site as its your opinion. But its not OK to make claims that are not true.
The FTC will subpoena your host for your information, not the networks. Ad networks act as a basic conduit for advertisements, similar to the newspapers, magazines, or TV commercials. The networks involvement is non-existent in this issue.
Everyones paranoia will kill the diet space before it even starts, you guys need to operate under one rule, make sure your ads are truthful, if they are you have nothing to worry about, if the product really helps you to flush pounds is not your concern, the company is the one asserting those claims you are taking their materials and distributing it, if its wrong its the advertiser who has to deal with it.
I would say there are close to 25K orders of acai a DAY, 750K a month, do you think the 86 complaints you see online are a lot in comparison? if you spent $750K and made $86 is it a lot?
And the complaints are due to growing pains more than anything, if you want to do something about the complaints stop marketing the offer for a week
This forum is very influential and very informative. It's like the Facebook and Myspace for affiliates :updown: What you say and do here is taken seriously and will hold a lot of good and solid weight. Plus, who can resist skittles :xmas-smiley-016:d03boy said:I had no idea there were so many CEO/Founders here. Can we get a full list somewhere not in the middle of a thread?
Wow, great thread. Kudos to Ruck and Mike on good posts.
I strongly disagree with Steve and ROIShareTeam in regard to being fucked over. I do not believe that should waive the right of privacy at all. That says to me "I'm all for privacy, unless they fuck me". I think people who intentionally fuck you should be terminated, then you deal with them LEGALLY if need be. Don't go around handing their info out willy nilly to get one over back.
This forum is very influential and very informative. It's like the Facebook and Myspace for affiliates :updown: What you say and do here is taken seriously and will hold a lot of good and solid weight. Plus, who can resist skittles :xmas-smiley-016:
I agree with Advaliant too, strongly. People are probably pulling out the false claims to catch acai "before it dies" sort of thing and get their share of the pie before it's all gone. I doubt these people who fear the FTC are planning on staying in Acai for long at all. However, I sure as shit bet this has prepared them a lot for the next big acai.
I want to see how the other big affiliate network companies work with privacy of affiliates. It should be interesting. I want to see CX Digital and Hydra mainly (yeah, not my fav networks).
It's cute that you pretend to have a real, successful network.I'm all for privacy as long as the affiliate isn't pulling of fraud, and costing advertisers and others thousands of dollars. Though, I would probably catch up with the affiliate and his fraudulent dealings before the advertiser sends in a taunting complaint. If it comes to some affiliate using a copyrighted image, or using celebs on their landing pages; then I'll protect their privacy until the FTC comes to my door with a subpoena. But as soon as they start taking money out of people's wallets fraudulently, that is where the privacy is broken.
Also, not to mention, that affiliates should not view the network as their scapegoat. A network is there to make it more difficult for the FTC or advertiser contact the affiliate, but not to shield them away from any fraudulent dealings, or take the blame for it. Fuck, I surely don't want to take the blame for an affiliate sending in thousands of fake leads, since it has no benefit to any party, besides his.
And heck, I surely don't want to set any terms that favor fraudulent affiliates. If the person is an honest affiliate, doesn't blatantly rip us off or anyone else, then he deserves privacy.
It's cute that you pretend to have a real, successful network.
Anyways, great to hear from so many network owners. It's also great to hear that you guys understand the importance of privacy, and won't go blabbing off info to Joe Schmo who thinks we scammed him.