Trump for US President?

I bet a piece of crap like Charlesmartel is pretty irrationally bitter that got he stomped by a female and is as a result in complete denial about it which is why he is back to posting his idiotic rhetoric rather than actually posting a competent rebuttal since that actually requires the use of his pretty lousy critical thinking skills.

Please be kind as I'm still suffering from the AIDS your post gave me.

FWIW, I didn't even read BabyGotRibs post. It was too long to bother with. As a matter of policy, I don't argue with women but I made an exception in your case.
 


Trump is perfect for a guy like charlesmartel who still refuses to accept the reality that he was completely dominated by BabyGotBacklink and now pretends like nothing happened by picking up where he left off with his youtube videos.

I don't have time to write 10 paragraph responses in response to her 10 paragraph comments. Sorry, but I'm more efficient when it comes to making a point. Why don't you point one thing where you think she "dominates" me and I'll take that on? Of course, I won't need 10 paragraphs to rebut her point.
 
Why don't you point one thing where you think she "dominates" me and I'll take that on? Of course, I won't need 10 paragraphs to rebut her point.

You need to read the whole thing to grasp what BabyGotBacklink is saying, and it's not my responsibility to act as your Cliff Notes. You must be one of those cretins that beats up the smart kid in school and then forces them to do your homework.

Also you're not "efficient" you egomaniac; you're a lazy slug that writes a paragraph worth of rhetoric and posts website links filled with paragraphs of text someone else wrote as well as youtube videos someone else made. In other words unlike BabyGotBacklink you severely lack in the critical thinking department and have others do the thinking for you. Asking me to condense BabyGotBacklink's writing into an easy to digest paragraph proves it.

You pretty much just seek out things that confirm your bias, and refuse to acknowledge anything that challenges your bias.

You're also the kind of low life that takes Trump at face value which says everything about your character. He's never going to build that wall you moron.

I can respect a pragmatist (galacon) who votes for Trump for the right reasons, but that's clearly not you. You're one of those mouth breathers that actually drank the Trump kool-aid which is both naive and pathetic.
 

Wow what a bunch of knuckle dragging hooting baboons. Charlesmartel with his lack of sophistication would fit right in.

My respect for Ted Cruz has gone up after watching that. That video and the previous video before it posted by jryan21 is certainly not flattering to Trump or his barely sentient Kool-Aide drinking supporters.

One thing Cruz is 100% on the money with is that wall Trump is advocating will never be built. It is pure rhetoric to attract the lowest common denominator; people like Charlesmartel.
 
What reality do you have to live in to believe Trump would be a good President for the US? You have to be one of those guys who has a pentagram painted on his kitchen floor, or cans of cash buried in the back yard, or whatever...
 
You need to read the whole thing to grasp what BabyGotBacklink is saying, and it's not my responsibility to act as your Cliff Notes. You must be one of those cretins that beats up the smart kid in school and then forces them to do your homework.

Also you're not "efficient" you egomaniac; you're a lazy slug that writes a paragraph worth of rhetoric and posts website links filled with paragraphs of text someone else wrote as well as youtube videos someone else made. In other words unlike BabyGotBacklink you severely lack in the critical thinking department and have others do the thinking for you. Asking me to condense BabyGotBacklink's writing into an easy to digest paragraph proves it.

You pretty much just seek out things that confirm your bias, and refuse to acknowledge anything that challenges your bias.

You're also the kind of low life that takes Trump at face value which says everything about your character. He's never going to build that wall you moron.

I can respect a pragmatist (galacon) who votes for Trump for the right reasons, but that's clearly not you. You're one of those mouth breathers that actually drank the Trump kool-aid which is both naive and pathetic.

So, we agree there's nothing of value in her post? Great. I know I'm right. That's why I don't want to waste time arguing with women or SJW's. It's just a waste of time.
 
Wow what a bunch of knuckle dragging hooting baboons. Charlesmartel with his lack of sophistication would fit right in.

My respect for Ted Cruz has gone up after watching that. That video and the previous video before it posted by jryan21 is certainly not flattering to Trump or his barely sentient Kool-Aide drinking supporters.

One thing Cruz is 100% on the money with is that wall Trump is advocating will never be built. It is pure rhetoric to attract the lowest common denominator; people like Charlesmartel.

You should get a gold star for being such a good, little SJW.
 
I know I'm right. That's why I don't want to waste time arguing with women or SJW's. It's just a waste of time.

You're not arguing you misguided fucking muppet, you're debating. Formulating a strong rebuttal to someone's valid points that did well rebuffing your own is not a waste of time; it's an exercise of your own logical and rhetorical abilities, things in which you are obviously deficient as evidenced by your lack of substantive response. And you sound like a stuck up little bitch when you slough it off like the debater is not worth your time, as though people here don't see through that shit. Isn't it fucking crazy bro that there are some women who might actually be smarter, more well informed, and more talented debaters than you?

You have time to read the articles and videos you post, expecting others to do the same, but you don't have time for a few paragraphs where someone took the time to respond to your points specifically? Are you really that much of a douche?

Or you did read and you just don't have it in you to muster a cogent reply? That's cool too man, just say so for people to know you're just taking a little time out in the corner with your political pacifier and safety blanket.

Good to see a little spark around here and a few WF panties in a bunch this political season, brings a reminiscent little tear to my eye.

*Paging JakeStratham*
 
You're not arguing you misguided fucking muppet, you're debating. Formulating a strong rebuttal to someone's valid points that did well rebuffing your own is not a waste of time; it's an exercise of your own logical and rhetorical abilities, things in which you are obviously deficient as evidenced by your lack of substantive response. And you sound like a stuck up little bitch when you slough it off like the debater is not worth your time, as though people here don't see through that shit. Isn't it fucking crazy bro that there are some women who might actually be smarter, more well informed, and more talented debaters than you?

You have time to read the articles and videos you post, expecting others to do the same, but you don't have time for a few paragraphs where someone took the time to respond to your points specifically? Are you really that much of a douche?

Or you did read and you just don't have it in you to muster a cogent reply? That's cool too man, just say so for people to know you're just taking a little time out in the corner with your political pacifier and safety blanket.

Good to see a little spark around here and a few WF panties in a bunch this political season, brings a reminiscent little tear to my eye.

*Paging JakeStratham*

I didn't read it because it was too long. The only thing I've read that long written by a woman that was worth the time was a recipe by Julia Child.

I'm going to be away on business for a couple days. Perhaps if you or BlueChinaDoll can find one good point in her essay I'll respond to it.
 
I didn't read it because it was too long. The only thing I've read that long written by a woman that was worth the time was a recipe by Julia Child.

I'm going to be away on business for a couple days.

You can keep saying this, but we all know you just need "a little time out in the corner with your political pacifier and safety blanket" as MSTeacher correctly noted.

Also being so dismissive of women just proves what a close minded tool you really are. I'm not sure exactly what makes you think you're so intellectually superior to a woman, particularly BabyGotBacklink.

You got schooled hard by MSTeacher, but your over sized ego refuses to let you admit defeat when everyone around you can see that you lost the debate big time and that you are being a HUGE bitch about it.

Hell I conceded that Trump stands a good chance of winning when the DNC leak happened. This is a complete reversal to my previous stance that Trump had no shot. You can't look at new information and publicly change your opinion? Again this negatively reflects on your character.

I also agree with MSteacher that this brings back a sliver of the good old days of WF.
 
I didn't read it because it was too long. The only thing I've read that long written by a woman that was worth the time was a recipe by Julia Child.

Well at least we're a bit more clear about the fact that you're just a garden variety misogynist halfwit.

I'm going to be away on business for a couple days. Perhaps if you or BlueChinaDoll can find one good point in her essay I'll respond to it.

No one cares enough about your points to do anything of the sort. Probably because they, unlike you, don't need asswipers to assist them with informal debate. As crazy as it sounds I think most others here can muster the wherewithal to attack the message not the sender, something you apparently still struggle with in a kind of "she's icky and has cooties" kind of way.

What happened Chuck, some little filly break your heart?

7d2ef83bf4a77b83f32202071f61ebbf.jpg
 
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YOPhr0UQ9wc[/ame]

And this is the result of political correctness

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FP4p4V0xLNU[/ame]

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=___u6zYx75Y[/ame]

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4RaKpf4Mhg4[/ame]

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OFG8wexlQeo[/ame]


You don’t control Muslim immigration in USA, you’ll creep towards what is happening in UK and Europe.

The primary school I went to switched to a muslim Pakistani headmaster. He changed history class from teaching about Henry the 8th and his wives to Mohammed’s life. In assembly, the head teacher teached us the principles of islam we should live by. I still remember ‘An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth’.

When Salmon Rushdie released his book, ‘The Satanic Verses’, the 6-11 year old muslims in my school wanted him killed (100% of them have this view). They all want him burned, hanged, and killed in a torturous way. They are all ‘moderate’ muslims.
 
We got our first Trump statue in Seattle today, they've already shown up in other cities:

https://www.reddit.com/r/Seattle/comments/4yda6q/so_this_appeared_on_the_corner_of_11th_and_pike/

MhrSQDU.jpg

That's kind of awesome. I can't decide if I hate it or love it but I want it in my foyer as an umbrella stand.

I think it is interesting to consider that would almost certainly never happen to a female candidate. If naked Hillary statues started showing up people would be calling that rape. Edit: interesting discussion on that reddit thread about that too