Martin Grunin - Facebook Ads Fraud - Bank Fraud - mgrunin

Status
Not open for further replies.
shindig said:
If I were him I'd be looking for a new country to call home.
Click to expand...

I'm sure Putin will welcome him back to the Motherland with open arms.

2d9zme1.jpg
 


poopie said:
The lawyer wants $20K and da Gru hasn't paid...
Click to expand...

Is this true???

If so... lolz. Quite a standup individual.

What's it gonna take to make him realize shit fo real.

The more I think about I'm glad he dumped BRC... my man doesn't need to be dealing with small timers who don't understand real world facts like the Gruster.
 
While catching up on all the legal wrangling to date, how many times do you think his new lawyer has said: "What the Fuck?!"
 
Ouch, so he's looking at probably around a $1.5 - $1.8 million judgement against him?

I guess it's to be expected though, because I would have done the same is I was FB's lawyers, and some idiot wasted my time with that sovereign man shit.
 
shindig said:
By far the dumbest reaction to the situation possible…..also getting nailed by the IRS for all that scam money he has to (eventually) pay back.
Click to expand...

I can only hope he had the sense to include that money on his returns, as should anyone who has ever even remotely dealt with Grunin (you are/will be under review) - per my encouragement for all to ponder Snipes several pages ago ITT. Always report everything, doing time because you think you are "smart" isn't.
 
mpbiz said:
I'm sure Putin will welcome him back to the Motherland with open arms.

2d9zme1.jpg
Click to expand...

Like millions of other people, I've been lurking in this thread almost daily but your photoshop pic pushed me over the edge for some reason and drove me to tears. I am finally ready to move on.

As a gift of thanks I'll be sending you a pre-release copy of the upcoming hit album 'Duets' by CEO-Sam and Stephen Wagenheim as well as a year's supply of Turtle Wax.
 
lmao
5. Amendment of Pleadings
Grunin intends to file a Motion to Strike the Docket Items Filed by his Prior
Representative, Brian Costello.
Click to expand...

4. Motions
On June 19, 2014, Facebook filed a Motion For an Order Prohibiting Brian Robert
Costello from Appearing on Behalf of Defendant and To Strike Dockets 8, 10, and 17 (dkt. 18).

On July 9, 2014, this Court issued an Order to Show Cause why that motion should not be
granted. Grunin did not respond, but instead filed a number of documents before the show cause
deadline, including a “Notice of Offer to Settle,” that, among other things, states that this Court
will be fined $500,000 for issuing rulings adverse to Grunin or otherwise intervening in this case
(dkt. 27); a “Legal Notice,” which claims that Facebook’s Motion to Strike “has no validity or
legal effect” and that Costello is “a Public Minister of the united states [sic] of America” (dkt.
30); and a “Notice of Default in Dishonor Consent to Judgment,” which claims that Facebook is
in “default” for failing to “honor” Grunin’s/Costello’s “Settlement Offer” (dkt. 31). The Court
granted that Motion on July 21, 2014 (dkt. 33).
Click to expand...
lolo

Although Grunin has failed to appear or file any responsive pleadings in this case, he has
filed a number of documents with the Court. See dkts. 8, 10, 17, 23, 26, 27, 30, 31, 32, 35, and
36.

These filings (a) are impermissible under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the
Northern District of California Local Rules, (b) disavow this Court’s judicial powers, see dkt. 35
(denying that the Court exists or has any powers), and (c) make extortionist demands of Facebook
and the Court, see, e.g., dkt. 8 (demanding that Facebook pay Grunin $1 million for the
“unauthorized” use of his name in pleadings) and dkt. 27 (demanding $500,000 from the Court if it intervened in the dispute between Facebook and Grunin).
It appears that Brian Robert Costello
has continued to participate in the case by recording documents in Nevada and filing pleadings
with Grunin's name affixed to them, despite the Court's Order barring him from doing so. See,
e.g., “Affidavit of Specific Negative Averement” (dkt. 35) (this document was mailed to the
Court from Nevada and filed with the county recorder in Nevada—where Costello resides, and
contains statements about being a “Sovereign Citizen” and about how the court system has no
jurisdiction over Grunin);

“Certificate of Administrative Judgment(s)” (dkt. 36) (also filed with
the county recorder in Nevada and signed by Costello’s girlfriend, Connie Huang); “Amended
Certificate of Administrative Judgment” (dkt. 37) (mailed to the Court from Nevada and signed
by Connie Huang); “Affidavit” (dkt. 39) (mailed to the Court from Nevada).
Click to expand...

6. Evidence Preservation
Facebook reviewed the Guidelines Relating to the Discovery of Electronically Stored
Information (“ESI Guidelines”), and took proportionate steps to preserve evidence relevant to the
issues reasonably evident in this action. Grunin demanded that Facebook tender payment of
$100,000 in exchange for his preservation of evidence related to this lawsuit. (Dkt. 17.)

To date,
Facebook does not know whether Grunin has preserved any evidence in connection with this
action.
Click to expand...

caseManagementStatemen... - Brought to you by View Docs Online

and

caseManageFB.pdf - Brought to you by View Docs Online
 
Ahahaha

BRC is now going to blame Grunins loss on him abandoning the Freedom Phenom strategy.

I wonder if you can strike a docket that you signed, mailed, and was recorded. Oopsies isn't generally allowed in court.

I imagine: Grunin was reading the last delusional affidavit and all the sudden realized "I've made a huge mistake" or... he has this nagging pit in his gut telling him that BRC was full of shit but he wanted to believe so hard...then finally had to cut the cord after jumping on the FBI radar.

Never in my internet histories have I enjoyed reading/following a thread this much. It's better than Drew Myers, Gary Thiem, Albany Plantation, Nick Sitko , and any others I've come across.
 
Hmmm..

It might work, as his previous representative was not allowed as one "Attorney-in-fact" being a made up title and all.

HE could just play dumb and tell the court he believed the guy.

::emp::
 
No time like the last minute to change your court strategy. I guess he realized he was in default and going to lose automatically.

I doubt Grunin preserved evidence, and demanding $100k to preserve evidence probably won't reflect well in court....

(ESI guidelines) A brief report certifying that the parties have reviewed the Guidelines Relating to the Discovery of Electronically Stored Information (“ESI Guidelines”), and confirming that the parties have met and conferred pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) regarding reasonable and proportionate steps taken to preserve evidence relevant to the issues reasonably evident in this action. See ESI Guidelines 2.01 and 2.02, and Checklist for ESI Meet and Confer.
Click to expand...

Grunin demanded that Facebook tender payment of
$100,000 in exchange for his preservation of evidence related to this lawsuit. (Dkt. 17.)
Click to expand...


And FB lawyer makes a great point, Grunin didn't respond to the official court documents, but at the same time he did filed a bunch of other documents with the court with his freeman shit, including extortion attempts. So how could he claim ignorance?
 
I_like_cock said:
and don't forget he referred to the federal judge as a child molester.

Poopie said he never paid the $20K retainer for his new lawyers too.

qlcing :pimp:
Click to expand...

ok, I called his attorney with my attempt at a thick, consanguineous Moldovan accent and asked if I could have more time to pay... was put on hold and the girl came back with, "we will need $4500 within 5 days to proceed; and the remainder before the next appearance"
 
poopie said:
ok, I called his attorney with my attempt at a thick, consanguineous Moldovan accent and asked if I could have more time to pay... was put on hold and the girl came back with, "we will need $4500 within 5 days to proceed; and the remainder before the next appearance"
Click to expand...

Dammit.

So that means there will be no "Motion to Set Aside Entry of Default" filed today???
 
I_like_cock said:
Dammit.

So that means there will be no "Motion to Set Aside Entry of Default" filed today???
Click to expand...

Sorry, I called last week. No idea on the time-line. I had a short list of questions but I didn't proceed as I had assumed they wouldn't buy my act.
 
His attorney is not even admitted to practice in California, for $4500 he could probably find a decent attorney in Cali to file a bunch of motions on his behalf.
I'm surprised he went this route.
 
johnysc430 said:
His attorney is not even admitted to practice in California, for $4500 he could probably find a decent attorney in Cali to file a bunch of motions on his behalf.
I'm surprised he went this route.
Click to expand...


No, but the Chicago atty is working with a Cali-Bar member. Both guys gotta get paid. I called the office in Lake Zurich, IL. They asked for $20K.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom