From what I understand, the big problem with LFTR reactors is containing the molten thorium salt which is extremely corrosive and, with current available materials, requires replacing the containment vessels every 5 years or so which isn't realistic, cost wise.
LENR has this tech beat by a light year... But of course it's going to take a bunch of years for it to mature. Thanks for the video.
LENR has never been attempted with He3 to my knowledge. They have many, many "recipes" for what gives off the best power output ratios, and I believe the current winner was Deuterium-Argon. (Cheap as dirt.)LENR I believe requires He3 which is extremely costly. Not that it's a bad idea at all, it isn't.
LENR has never been attempted with He3 to my knowledge. They have many, many "recipes" for what gives off the best power output ratios, and I believe the current winner was Deuterium-Argon. (Cheap as dirt.)
Powdered Nickle-Palladium is what Rossi and Dekaflion are using, but there may be some fraud going on there and I will stick to the official CERN findings for now.
What makes LENR so special is two-fold:
1. LENR has the highest energy output ratio ever discovered.
2. LENR is also highly portable, and they theorize future LENR power plants that fit in cell phones.
Since LENR is neither fission nor fusion tho, we'd better expect a long damn wait to get our hands on it... Too much R&D left to do.
I'd welcome some Thorium plants popping up in the meantime. Or even some Terrapower Inc. recycled-waste fission plants.
Just keep in mind that no dominant power source has EVER made it widespread without a government pumping trillions of dollars into infrastructure for it... Therefore even if a Thorium plant is perfected and cost-effective, the Govs of the world don't have a lot of incentive to replace Oil/Coal plants.We'll see what happens though...........I guess.