handrewrites' 1003rd post - content

handrewrites

My Member 8=============3
Oct 24, 2010
1,141
21
0
I just can't figure out what to cover so I'm going to make this a "kick-things-off-then-answer-the-questions-that-follow" thread.

How do you define a "quality" article?
As vague as the words "quality" and "article" are, this depends almost entirely on the purpose of the content. Sometimes perfect spelling and grammar is unnecessary and can even be counter-productive. Something could read like a 6-year-old wrote it on his first day of school, and it would be 5-star content if it does what it was intended to do.

How to become a better writer

Read. A lot. A lot of the particular kind of content that you want to be good at writing. The more you read the better - it's why copywriters spend so much time reading other (successful) sales letters. Want to be good at writing software product reviews? Get ready to spend a lot of time on CNET.com. Want to master the art of trolling? You're on the right track (here).

For content providers
My advice would be to create a near-failsafe system that virtually guarantees a consistent level of quality and turnaround times with no surprises. But how? Here are some ideas:

1. Keep rates reasonably high - this will motivate writers to produce quality work rather than waste your time with dogshit.
2. BUT supplement the higher rates with stricter rules/penalties, e.g. I'd love to see a system of monetary punishment for writers who give up on an article and cancel it since it's time wasted for everyone. Stricter rules = more consistent quality and turnaround times
3. ???
4. Profit

Basically what I'm saying is you should balance incentives and deterrents to create the perfect shower head - one that will ensure a steady stream of warm water of the perfect temperature, rather than sending out unpredictable bursts of scalding hot, freezing cold, rust water, dog semen and everything in between (can you feel my frustration with flaky writers yet?)

PS. I don't write. In total I've written around $15 worth of content on WF which was more than enough for me realize that I hate writing with a passion. My brain just isn't wired for it - writing a 500-word article is enough to burn me out for the rest of the day.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tomaszjot


can i copy this and submit it to ezine
Well, I did state at the beginning that it was a Q&A thread.. I know that in its current state this thread is worthy of being Panda-slapped, but I promise I'll reply with some more substantial stuff.

I just need something to respond to. My brain is like a dynamically-generated site - no pages are created until requests are made. -1 for creativity and +1 for problem-solving I suppose.
 
iFlLu.jpg
 
I want my 72 seconds back. That was, bar none, the most pointless milestone post on WF. Dude, you have brought douchebaggery to a new level.
 
Damn some of you guys have no idea just what I outed in the post - I pretty much provided the key to a competitive content brokering business model.

The key is to prevent unaccountable ways that writers can fuck over clients - for example if an outsourcing site allows clients to leave feedback on completed work, but not for uncompleted/cancelled projects, then workers will have an incentive to flake on / cancel projects that they've screwed up as this won't have any negative consequences (i.e. doesn't show up on the record).

Prevent this sort of thing to guarantee certain things to a client (e.g. dependability, timeliness, etc.) and you will corner the content creation market.
 
Please tell us why we should take content creation advice from someone who doesn't create content or brokering advice from a burger man. Saying that a "quality" article can have grammar errors and read like a 6 year old wrote it isn't good advice.
 
handrewrites - I liked your 1000th milestone post and + rep you. Please remember it and support my equally lame thread the same way once I reach 1000 milestone. Thanks.
 
Please tell us why we should take content creation advice from someone who doesn't create content or brokering advice from a burger man. Saying that a "quality" article can have grammar errors and read like a 6 year old wrote it isn't good advice.
I don't create content, but I'm still damn good at it (read the reviews in my past BST threads). I put this to good use by providing clear and concise instructions when hiring writers myself - speaking of which, whenever you outsource content, the more instructions (and the more detailed they are) the greater the chance that you'll be happy with what you get.

And just like using negative keywords with PPC, remember to be clear about what NOT to do when making your order as well.

As for "quality" "articles", the reason I put those words in quotes is because those words are so.. vague.

I chose to define "quality articles" as content that successfully serves its intended purpose. If you had a flash gaming site and you hired outsourcers and instructed them to make comments that sounded like they were from 10-year-old kids (to create the illusion of popularity with children), then articulate sentences and perfect grammar would NOT be ideal.

Oh and I don't really flip burgers. Why do that when there's welfare.
 
need burger-flipping WF mastermind group.

PS - isn't it pink slime-flipping now? not burger flipping.