LAYERED LINKS RESURRECTED
- Thread starter onkelmicha
- Start date
- Status
Cheers, thanks for taking the time. Would appreciate any SERP movement feedback in a couple weeks as well if you remember.
Fair number of projects waiting on article approval before they can move forward, if you ignored a Layered Links email recently, I'm talking to you.
Just placed an order. Looking forward to seeing what you guys can do. Many more orders in play if this goes well
Approved, waiting on you.
Approved, paid, started. Thanks for the repeat business.
Regarding logins, it was a separate issue (since fixed) unrelated to the old login hell. Yeah, I'm gunshy about that. Thanks for the feedback, appreciated.
HERE WE GO AGAIN
A friendly reminder please log into the system if your recently made any orders and look if there is content that is ready to be approved form you, since we cant work on your projects if you havent done so
M
A friendly reminder please log into the system if your recently made any orders and look if there is content that is ready to be approved form you, since we cant work on your projects if you havent done so
M
Last edited:
Why not, put through a second order #677. Please approve so I can pay
Done..appreciate the heads up.
Waiting for a reply to my last message (regarding order #677), and still waiting on an edit review for order #650.
I don't know if I'm being pedantic or whatever, but considering these articles are going on Web 2.0 properties, is their stick rate is defined by their readability? If so, then you guys need to improve the review & editing process. I just read the second set of articles (order #677), and again the same issues are clear.
Namely:
- The writer does not seem to grasp how to use the definite article correctly (i.e. "the")
- Some sentences simply don't make sense
- Pluralisation is used incorrectly in some places
Hopefully all will be resolved
I don't know if I'm being pedantic or whatever, but considering these articles are going on Web 2.0 properties, is their stick rate is defined by their readability? If so, then you guys need to improve the review & editing process. I just read the second set of articles (order #677), and again the same issues are clear.
Namely:
- The writer does not seem to grasp how to use the definite article correctly (i.e. "the")
- Some sentences simply don't make sense
- Pluralisation is used incorrectly in some places
Hopefully all will be resolved
Waiting for a reply to my last message (regarding order #677), and still waiting on an edit review for order #650.
I don't know if I'm being pedantic or whatever, but considering these articles are going on Web 2.0 properties, is their stick rate is defined by their readability? If so, then you guys need to improve the review & editing process. I just read the second set of articles (order #677), and again the same issues are clear.
Namely:
- The writer does not seem to grasp how to use the definite article correctly (i.e. "the")
- Some sentences simply don't make sense
- Pluralisation is used incorrectly in some places
Hopefully all will be resolved
Well even thouhg we hussle most days of the week so does it ocassionaly happen that we dont work sundays.
Articles on 677 shall be reuploaded already.
Replied to your pm in the website as well
-Micha
Hey Micha,
Thanks for your reply, no worries about the Sunday
Still waiting on the article edits on both #650 and #677. Are these in progress?
Pm sent...
-m
- Status