What are the rules to put link signature?



hrishivardhan said:
What are the rules and requirements to put link signature of this forum?
Click to expand...

You can only have services from SEO EXPERTS in your signature. Like such as for example incoming links experts, contents and affiliation marketings you can also avail. Please be always providing heartily customer support respectably to customers also.


:uhoh2:
 
Jon went and fired all the mods, then disappeared himself again, so you're pretty much fucked for getting a link in your signature. Sorry.
 
hrishivardhan said:
What are the rules and requirements to put link signature of this forum?
Click to expand...

Don't listen to these guys, they are trying to play the joke onto you.

To add a signature to your profile you must go to this thread, How Did You Find Out About WickedFire? You should have seen it at the top of the forum. You will need to post a photography of yourself holding a piece of paper with your screen name and a spoon, a real spoon, not a picture of a spoon. Yes, this sounds like strange, but it the way they approve people on here.

Hope this helps yourself.
 
DewChugr said:
Don't listen to these guys, they are trying to play the joke onto you.

To add a signature to your profile you must go to this thread, How Did You Find Out About WickedFire? You should have seen it at the top of the forum. You will need to post a photography of yourself holding a piece of paper with your screen name and a spoon, a real spoon, not a picture of a spoon. Yes, this sounds like strange, but it the way they approve people on here.

Hope this helps yourself.
Click to expand...

Here's the thing. You called a picture a photography.
Is it in the same family? Yes. No one's arguing that.
As someone who is a scientist who studies pictures, I am telling you, specifically, in science, no one calls photography pictures. If you want to be "specific" like you said, then you shouldn't either. They're not the same thing.
If you're saying "picture family" you're referring to the taxonomic grouping of Picturae, which includes things from pics to images to JPGs.
So your reasoning for calling a picture a photography is because random people do it? Let's get videos and PDFs in there, then, too.
Also, calling someone a human or an ape? It's not one or the other, that's not how taxonomy works. They're both. A picture is a picture and a member of the photography family. But that's not what you said. You said a picture is a photography, which is not true unless you're okay with calling all members of the picture family photography, which means you'd call pics, images, and other visual art photography, too. Which you said you don't.
It's okay to just admit you're wrong, you know?

imgur 6J0vMhm
 
zxcvb said:
Here's the thing. You called a picture a photography.
Is it in the same family? Yes. No one's arguing that.
As someone who is a scientist who studies pictures, I am telling you, specifically, in science, no one calls photography pictures. If you want to be "specific" like you said, then you shouldn't either. They're not the same thing.
If you're saying "picture family" you're referring to the taxonomic grouping of Picturae, which includes things from pics to images to JPGs.
So your reasoning for calling a picture a photography is because random people do it? Let's get videos and PDFs in there, then, too.
Also, calling someone a human or an ape? It's not one or the other, that's not how taxonomy works. They're both. A picture is a picture and a member of the photography family. But that's not what you said. You said a picture is a photography, which is not true unless you're okay with calling all members of the picture family photography, which means you'd call pics, images, and other visual art photography, too. Which you said you don't.
It's okay to just admit you're wrong, you know?

imgur 6J0vMhm
Click to expand...

potato
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back