Russian Fucks over Bank

nomak

agent provocateur
Apr 28, 2010
445
4
0
In the shadows
A Russian man who decided to write his own small print in a credit card contract has had his changes upheld in court. He's now suing the country's leading online bank for more than 24 million rubles ($727,000) in compensation.

Disappointed by the terms of the unsolicited offer for a credit card from Tinkoff Credit Systems in 2008, a 42-year-old Dmitry Agarkov from the city of Voronezh decided to hand write his own credits terms.

The trick was that Agarkov simply scanned the bank’s document and ‘amended’ the small print with his own terms.

He opted for a 0 percent interest rate and no fees, adding that the customer "is not obliged to pay any fees and charges imposed by bank tariffs." The bank, however, didn’t read ‘the amendments’, as it signed and certified the document, as well as sent the man a credit card. Under the agreement, the bank OK'd to provide unlimited credit, according to Agarkov’s lawyer Dmitry Mikhalevich talking to Kommersant daily.

"The opened credit line was unlimited. He could afford to buy an island somewhere in Malaysia, and the bank would have to pay for it by law," Mikhalevich added.

Agarkov also changed the URL of the site where the terms and conditions were published and hedged against the bank’s breaking of the agreement. For each unilateral change in the terms provided in the agreement, the bank would be asked to pay the customer (Agarkov) 3 million rubles ($91,000), or a cancelation fee of 6 million rubles ($182,000).

http://rt.com/business/man-outsmarts-banks-wins-court-221/
 


Oh because they signed the doc.!!

It wasnt the Russian Guy's "policy"

fuck the banks
 
This could only happen in Mother Russia

5a90e3246e5ad7b0889bf386a01ff189.png


putin-bird.jpg
 
This guy is fucking awesome, and what he did is completely legal, after all they signed the contract themselves :)
 
Dmitry Agarko( customer) and Dmitry Mikhalevich( lawyer)...

A perfect combination for a scamming company, named Dmitry & Dmitry INC.

The Dmitry duo should look at the bigger picture.

That reminds me, it was a gang of 4 Russian coders that stole CC numbers of millions of people online and then drew out hoards of cash. And it's like been 2 weeks and now we have Dmitry & Dmitry INC.
 
I know this is Russia but...

The whole idea of a contract is that two entities agree to something where both parties have something to gain. You cannot create a contract where you just give someone money for nothing. That's a gift.

By the sounds of it the amendment he made was pretty much that. He conned the bank into giving him something for nothing. Thereby nulling the contract pretty much.
 
The whole idea of a contract is that two entities agree to something where both parties have something to gain. You cannot create a contract where you just give someone money for nothing. That's a gift.

By the sounds of it the amendment he made was pretty much that. He conned the bank into giving him something for nothing. Thereby nulling the contract pretty much.
You're talking about "good faith".

The Bank exercised "good faith" by agreeing without coercion, what they didn't exercise was "due diligence".

Good faith is a requirement of a binding contract. Due diligence is not.
 
I know this is Russia but...

The whole idea of a contract is that two entities agree to something where both parties have something to gain. You cannot create a contract where you just give someone money for nothing. That's a gift.

By the sounds of it the amendment he made was pretty much that. He conned the bank into giving him something for nothing. Thereby nulling the contract pretty much.

Nope, he didn't cone anyone, a contract is a contract the terms do not matter :)