I've been doing some work with Flash recently and I played with the idea of developing a landing page supported by flash. Have there been any case studies measuring the difference in the effectiveness of sites using flash versus the use of jpegs?
Here's why I ask...
Creating flash links and a flash interface adds some degree of professionalism, originality, and legitimacy (an illusion?). Most landing pages are simply decorated with .jpeg's. So I was wondering if adding a flash interface will still result in a higher CTR, especially since there is somewhat of a link mask (basically people can't see the affiliate text at the bottom of the screen if they were to hover over it). This interface, of course, would be supported by plain text comprising much of the page.
So to break it down: flash or jpegs? Interactive or static? Any experiences?
Here's why I ask...
Creating flash links and a flash interface adds some degree of professionalism, originality, and legitimacy (an illusion?). Most landing pages are simply decorated with .jpeg's. So I was wondering if adding a flash interface will still result in a higher CTR, especially since there is somewhat of a link mask (basically people can't see the affiliate text at the bottom of the screen if they were to hover over it). This interface, of course, would be supported by plain text comprising much of the page.
So to break it down: flash or jpegs? Interactive or static? Any experiences?