A buddy of mine mentioned how Google's server layout is somewhat unique in that it uses tens of thousands of low end servers to do the majority of its work as opposed to really high end expensive servers. For some reason I just thought of it a few days ago, and had a quick look around.
The basic idea is they cluster thousands of servers at various datacenters, and they have servers that are constantly failing. But because of the redundency and sheer numbers, they don't take a hit in processing. And the servers aren't top of the line, so it actually runs cheaper than a multithousand dollar server rock.
Anyone know of any more information on this? I thought it was rather interesting the approach they took to this.
The basic idea is they cluster thousands of servers at various datacenters, and they have servers that are constantly failing. But because of the redundency and sheer numbers, they don't take a hit in processing. And the servers aren't top of the line, so it actually runs cheaper than a multithousand dollar server rock.
Anyone know of any more information on this? I thought it was rather interesting the approach they took to this.