FED AUDIT: $16,000,000,000,000.00 (TRILLION) AID REPORT

Wicked Ice

Busy
Nov 11, 2007
1,649
21
0
Have you read about the first ever audit of the Fed? You'll understand why the world is in such a deep shit.

The first ever GAO audit of the Federal Reserve was carried out in the past few months due to the Ron Paul, Alan Grayson Amendment to the Dodd-Frank bill, which passed last year. Jim DeMint, a Republican Senator, and Bernie Sanders, an independent Senator, led the charge for a Federal Reserve audit in the Senate, but watered down the original language of the house bill (HR1207), so that a complete audit would not be carried out. Ben Bernanke, Alan Greenspan, and various other bankers vehemently opposed the audit and lied to Congress about the effects an audit would have on markets. Nevertheless, the results of the first audit in the Federal Reserve nearly 100 year history were posted here:

http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d11696.pdf

What was revealed in the audit was startling:

$16,000,000,000,000.00 (TRILLION) had been secretly given out to US banks and corporations and foreign banks everywhere from France to Scotland. From the period between December 2007 and June 2010, the Federal Reserve had secretly bailed out many of the worldâs banks, corporations, and governments. The Federal Reserve likes to refer to these secret bailouts as an all-inclusive loan program, but virtually none of the money has been returned and it was loaned out at 0% interest.

Why the Federal Reserve had never been public about this or even informed the United States Congress about the $16 trillion dollar bailout is obvious the American public would have been outraged to find out that the Federal Reserve bailed out foreign banks while Americans were struggling to find jobs. To place $16 trillion into perspective, remember that GDP of the United States is only $14.12 trillion. The entire national debt of the United States government spanning its 200+ year history is only $14.5 trillion.

The budget that is being debated so heavily in Congress and the Senate is only $3.5 trillion. Take all of the outrage and debate over the $1.5 trillion deficit into consideration, and swallow this Red pill: There was no debate about whether $16,000,000,000,000 would be given to failing banks and failing corporations around the world. In late 2008, the TARP Bailout bill was passed and loans of $800 billion were given to failing banks and companies. That was a blatant lie considering the fact that Goldman Sachs alone received 814 billion dollars. As is turns out, the Federal Reserve donated $2.5 trillion to Citigroup, while Morgan Stanley received $2.04 trillion. The Royal Bank of Scotland and Deutsche Bank, a German bank, split about a trillion and numerous other banks received hefty chunks of the $16 trillion. ****

When you have conservative Republican stalwarts like Jim DeMint(R-SC) and Ron Paul(R-TX) as well as self-identified Democratic socialists like Bernie Sanders all fighting against the Federal Reserve, you know that it is no longer an issue of Right versus Left. When you have every single member of the Republican Party in Congress and progressive Congressmen like Dennis Kucinich sponsoring a bill to audit the Federal Reserve, you realize that the Federal Reserve is an entity onto itself, which has no oversight and no accountability.

Americans should be swelled with anger and outrage at the abysmal state of affairs when an unelected group of bankers can create money out of thin air and give it out to megabanks and super-corporations like Halloween candy.

The list of institutions that received the most money from the Federal Reserve can be found on page 144 of the GAO Audit and are as follows:

Citigroup: $2.5 trillion($2,500,000,000,000)
Morgan Stanley: $2.04 trillion ($2,040,000,000,000)
Merrill Lynch: $1.949 trillion ($1,949,000,000,000)
Bank of America: $1.344 trillion ($1,344,000,000,000)
Barclays PLC (United Kingdom): $868 billion* ($868,000,000,000)
Bear Sterns: $853 billion ($853,000,000,000)
Goldman Sachs: $814 billion ($814,000,000,000)
Royal Bank of Scotland (UK): $541 billion ($541,000,000,000)
JP Morgan Chase: $391 billion ($391,000,000,000)
Deutsche Bank (Germany): $354 billion ($354,000,000,000)
UBS (Switzerland): $287 billion ($287,000,000,000)
Credit Suisse (Switzerland): $262 billion ($262,000,000,000)
Lehman Brothers: $183 billion ($183,000,000,000)
Bank of Scotland (United Kingdom): $181 billion ($181,000,000,000)
BNP Paribas (France): $175 billion ($175,000,000,000)

GAO Audit: Fed’s $16 Trillion in Aid | The Big Picture

ihme2rhCES6po.jpg
 


$16,000,000,000,000.00 (TRILLION) had been secretly given out to US banks and corporations and foreign banks everywhere from France to Scotland. From the period between December 2007 and June 2010, the Federal Reserve had secretly bailed out many of the worldâs banks, corporations, and governments. The Federal Reserve likes to refer to these secret bailouts as an all-inclusive loan program, but virtually none of the money has been returned and it was loaned out at 0% interest.

Can you please tell me where in this document it states that virtually none of the money has been returned?

On figure 11, page 137, The graph shows that total outstanding loans from this program are less than 50 billion. So to me, it seems like most of the loans have been paid back.

Oh and you look at that, on page 3 we have a nice pretty graph showing less than 13 billion dollars are outstanding from these programs.

So your spinning the truth to make your point, pretty bullshit dude.
 
Oh, and where's the mention of 16 trillion dollars? I don't see one. I see mention of 1.4 trillion dollars being loaned out, with less than 13 billion yet to be returned.
 
Can you please tell me where in this document it states that virtually none of the money has been returned?

On figure 11, page 137, The graph shows that total outstanding loans from this program are less than 50 billion. So to me, it seems like most of the loans have been paid back.

Oh and you look at that, on page 3 we have a nice pretty graph showing less than 13 billion dollars are outstanding from these programs.

I don't see a graph on page 3

@137.11 You're only looking at a single loan program totaling 1 trillion ... I've not had a chance to go over the whole doc to see how much of the whole has been paid, but it's not fair to look at a small fraction and consider it reflection of the whole. Each of these programs were given for specific reasons, that one dealt with liquidity issues if I'm reading it correctly.

edit: looks like I read it wrong as it's titled "Total Loans Outstanding for Broad-Based Programs, December 1, 2007–June 29, 2011" ... but doesn't account for 12/13th of the money mentioned. So it's not one program, but it is a fraction of the whole in some form

Oh, and where's the mention of 16 trillion dollars? I don't see one. I see mention of 1.4 trillion dollars being loaned out, with less than 13 billion yet to be returned.

Table 8, page 131 ... $16.115 trillion




On a side note ... I wonder how much of this monies was returned to the fed, but deposited in the fractional account so they can re-lend it again. Most companies loaned to have banking sides as well as the investment divisions that went broke.


Also: this document was probably written by lawyers instead of the normal accountant audits. There's a very good chance that nothing we see on the surface has value.
 
Also, to be fair, it's probably a pretty good investment, bailing out the banks. Royal bank of Scotland has shot up from £0.05 before it was bailed out to £0.50, and rising, assuming they take a profit when the money's returned.
 
Key passage on page 130:

Table 8 aggregates total dollar
transaction amounts by adding the total dollar amount of all loans but
does not adjust these amounts to reflect differences across programs in
the term over which loans were outstanding. For example, an overnight
PDCF loan of $10 billion that was renewed daily at the same level for 30
business days would result in an aggregate amount borrowed of $300
billion although the institution, in effect, borrowed only $10 billion over 30
days. In contrast, a TAF loan of $10 billion extended over a 1-month
period would appear as $10 billion. As a result, the total transaction
amounts shown in table 8 for PDCF are not directly comparable to the
total transaction amounts shown for TAF and other programs that made
loans for periods longer than overnight.
In other words, table 8 (where the $16T number comes from) is every loan added together. Many of the loans made were short term, some as short as one day ("overnight") before being repaid, only to be made again the next day (renewed). $10B loaned overnight, repaid, and renewed the next day counts as $20B, and so on. Obviously, nothing to get worked up about.

Anyway, the bulk of the loans appear to have been paid back, if I'm reading it right.
 
I don't see a graph on page 3

Page 3 of the actual document, like the 3rd page in. Not the page # listed.


@137.11 You're only looking at a single loan program totaling 1 trillion ... I've not had a chance to go over the whole doc to see how much of the whole has been paid, but it's not fair to look at a small fraction and consider it reflection of the whole. Each of these programs were given for specific reasons, that one dealt with liquidity issues if I'm reading it correctly.

We are looking at the exact same data, just presented differently. I'm looking at the term-adjusted data, you're looking at the non-term adjusted data.

Here's more info:

Table 8 aggregates total dollar transaction amounts by adding the total dollar amount of all loans but does not adjust these amounts to reflect differences across programs in the term over which loans were outstanding. For example, an overnight PDCF loan of $10 billion that was renewed daily at the same level for 30 business days would result in an aggregate amount borrowed of $300
billion although the institution, in effect, borrowed only $10 billion over 30
In contrast, a TAF loan of $10 billion extended over a 1-month
period would appear as $10 billion. As a result, the total transaction
amounts shown in table 8 for PDCF are not directly comparable to the
total transaction amounts shown for TAF and other programs that made
loans for periods longer than overnight.

As you can tell from that description, the 16 trillion number is inflated. Going off of the term adjusted numbers, 99% of the loans have been paid back.
 
Key passage on page 130:

In other words, table 8 (where the $16T number comes from) is every loan added together. Many of the loans made were short term, some as short as one day ("overnight") before being repaid, only to be made again the next day (renewed). $10B loaned overnight, repaid, and renewed the next day counts as $20B, and so on. Obviously, nothing to get worked up about.

Anyway, the bulk of the loans appear to have been paid back, if I'm reading it right.

You are reading this right, and your example is accurate.

It's like if I loaned you $10 every morning and you gave me $10 every night. At the end of the year, I say I've loaned you "$3,650" dollars this year, when I really only loaned you $10.

The Feds never had more than 1-2 trillion dollars out in loans at any given time, as is shown in Figure 11 on Page 137.
 
Anyway, the bulk of the loans appear to have been paid back, if I'm reading it right.

Going off of the term adjusted numbers, 99% of the loans have been paid back.

I'm not sure how that makes everything ok. Of course none of the toxic assets like TARP (included in this doc) and the creative llc shenanigans are accounted for on you two's version of a balance sheet. If all these 1 day loans were market based, that would never be possible. Each is a default and would accrue interest (of course, these were all interest free).

In a few cases, the Federal Reserve Board authorized aReserve Bank to lend to a limited liability corporation (LLC) to finance thepurchase of assets from a single institution.
sounds like enron financing v2

Most of the contracts, including 8 of the 10 highest-valuecontracts, were awarded noncompetitively, primarily due to exigentcircumstances.
pork or nepotism?

existing standards for managing employee conflicts maynot be sufficient to avoid the appearance of a conflict in allsituations.
conflicts of interest everywhere

Seriously guys, take off the blinders, you're rooting for the wrong team
 
Also, to be fair, it's probably a pretty good investment, bailing out the banks. Royal bank of Scotland has shot up from £0.05 before it was bailed out to £0.50, and rising, assuming they take a profit when the money's returned.

I don't think they made profit on these transactions, although I may be wrong. But I do agree that these were good, if not great investments.

I'm sure the Fed didn't loan trillions out because they were bored, they probably saved the world from a financial collapse and decade long depression.
 
  • Like
Reactions: miketpowell
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8wRfuAUubT0]Conspiracy Theory Jesse Ventura S02E03 Wall Street 3/3 - YouTube[/ame]