I sold some camera gear on eBay recently and the buyer is claiming it's not working properly (Specifically, it's an old Canon FD prime lens that apparently doesn't focus properly). He hasn't asked for a refund yet, but I can see it coming.
I know how I'd like to be treated if I were the buyer in this case, so I'm torn between wanting to be a good 'citizen' and refunding (he pays postage of course), and saying "screw you, it was marked 'as is': this is what you get for buying on eBay".
As said, I listed it 'as is' and made no claims about the functioning of the item -- only described its outward/obvious appearance. I didn't have an old camera body to test it with so didn't say anything in the description about whether it was actually functional or not (Stupidly, I didn't say it was 'not tested' -- I usually do this but forgot this time. Advice for anyone selling old shit on eBay: make sure you cover your ass and specify what you do and what you don't know).
What would you do? Refund or play hardball? Something else?
I know how I'd like to be treated if I were the buyer in this case, so I'm torn between wanting to be a good 'citizen' and refunding (he pays postage of course), and saying "screw you, it was marked 'as is': this is what you get for buying on eBay".
As said, I listed it 'as is' and made no claims about the functioning of the item -- only described its outward/obvious appearance. I didn't have an old camera body to test it with so didn't say anything in the description about whether it was actually functional or not (Stupidly, I didn't say it was 'not tested' -- I usually do this but forgot this time. Advice for anyone selling old shit on eBay: make sure you cover your ass and specify what you do and what you don't know).
What would you do? Refund or play hardball? Something else?