how is 320x480 the most common resolution, yet only 30% of views are on mobile. who the hell has a 320x480 desktop monitor? what is that like 6"?
320x480 monitor?
- Thread starter o hai guyz
- Start date
Ok, let's break this down, together since it's too complicated. We'll make a list of the long, and very confusing data points and see what pops up.
1) According to your sig you run iPhone background sites.
2) The original iPhone was 320*480 resolution.
Wait, no, that wasn't complicated at all. I guess you're just an idiot.
1) According to your sig you run iPhone background sites.
2) The original iPhone was 320*480 resolution.
Wait, no, that wasn't complicated at all. I guess you're just an idiot.
Bullshit. Look at all those screen sizes, most are mobile device resolutions. Further, your equating inches to pixels in your original post, so it's pretty clear you don't have a clue about screens, of any variety. I suggest a new career - I hear Pewep is looking for an apprentice.
like i said i havent promoted this site on mobile at all. its not possible that people are seeing the ads in web browsers and then visiting them in mobile or the total # of mobile resolution hits would still be lower than the web hits, which isnt the case. although analytics is reporting 35% mobile 65% web so it isn't consistent at all
as far as pixels not relating to screen sizes its pretty obvious 320x480 is a tiny screen, unless theres some ultra-specialized need for a 24" monitor with a 320x480 res, which this site's demo wouldn't be using anyway. so in the context of this post it doesnt make sense
as far as pixels not relating to screen sizes its pretty obvious 320x480 is a tiny screen, unless theres some ultra-specialized need for a 24" monitor with a 320x480 res, which this site's demo wouldn't be using anyway. so in the context of this post it doesnt make sense
