Trump for US President?

Go Trump ha ha. Stayed up through the night watching it all. Just gutted I didn't have a large bet on the outcome. Pretty sure the odds were floating between 3/1 and 4/1 yesterday.
 


Y4bwTQ0.jpg
 
Hell I am glad Trump won and the GOP controls congress. Trump's tax plan is attractive if you have any kind of business in the USA. I'm glad I was wrong and you guys were right because I think Hillary is a criminal and she is probably worried after what Trump said during the presidential debate about appointing a special prosecutor to investigate her.

This is going to be an exciting four years. Congrats to everyone who voted and bet on Trump. The SJW tears about a Trump victory are delicious too.
 
bluechinagroup said:
Hell I am glad Trump won and the GOP controls congress. Trump's tax plan is attractive if you have any kind of business in the USA. I'm glad I was wrong and you guys were right because I think Hillary is a criminal and she is probably worried after what Trump said during the presidential debate about appointing a special prosecutor to investigate her.

This is going to be an exciting four years. Congrats to everyone who voted and bet on Trump. The SJW tears about a Trump victory are delicious too.
Click to expand...

The specifics of his tax plan remain to be seen. He has only specifically mentioned cutting the corporate tax rate which has 2 problems. 1) Nonpartisan govt. budget review indicates will raise the deficit (= we can't afford it) 2) C-corps will benefit on corporate taxes. In other words small businesses LLCs, S Corps, etc are not subject to double taxation and do not pay corporate taxes. So in typical republican fashion it's a tax break for the 1%. Good for those who believe in trickle down economics. If Hillary is a criminal, which I agree to a certain extent, then what are most politicians. Look at Donald Trump - he gave $25,000 to Pam Bondi (the Florida attorney general) and she then suddenly dropped the case (his University one). He was fined because he paid the $25K from his charitable foundation account.
 
holyearth said:
The specifics of his tax plan remain to be seen. He has only specifically mentioned cutting the corporate tax rate which has 2 problems. 1) Nonpartisan govt. budget review indicates will raise the deficit (= we can't afford it) 2) C-corps will benefit on corporate taxes. In other words small businesses LLCs, S Corps, etc are not subject to double taxation and do not pay corporate taxes. So in typical republican fashion it's a tax break for the 1%. Good for those who believe in trickle down economics. If Hillary is a criminal, which I agree to a certain extent, then what are most politicians. Look at Donald Trump - he gave $25,000 to Pam Bondi (the Florida attorney general) and she then suddenly dropped the case (his University one). He was fined because he paid the $25K from his charitable foundation account.
Click to expand...

Nobody is stopping you from electing to treat your LLC as a C corp. Likewise, any S corp can be changed to a C corp. I actually prefer C corps, and there are ways to avoid double taxation since that is only a problem if you pay yourself a dividend.

Also if your business crashes and burns as an S corp (for example because all of your merchant processing from your profitable biz were cut) and you owe taxes from profits it generated, guess what? The IRS can go after you personally. On the other hand, with a C corp your liability is limited and the IRS can't personally hold you liable*

*Unless you did not maintain the corporation properly and they pierce the corporate veil and/or the corporation gave you personal loans that you did not pay back
 
SeoReborn said:
See, here's for believing the polls. All you had to do was compare the number of people that showed up in the rallies instead of believing mainstream propaganda. - Eurofag (me) who compared this election to brexit.
Click to expand...


There's more to it than just people at rallies, true those people stuck with him through the whole campaign, but after the last debate they knew it wasn't enough to win outright. The last 2 weeks were all about suppressing Democrat turnout, particularly in FL, but it also worked in the Great Lakes area. Another factor is that the Democrats have taken for granted their historical advantage in early voting. During the primaries, Trump won quite a few states by getting people at the rallies to vote early, somehow the Clinton campaign didn't pick up on that until late in the game.

Most of the projections for the last few weeks were way off, no one seemed to know how to model a negative race where one side tries to build a coalition from the opponent's disaffected party base and the other side tries to suppress the opponent's turnout. Nate Silver's model came the closest while the others were giving Clinton a 90% or more win probability. The 538 model was only giving between 60-75% probabilities over the last 2 weeks. What I hear from the internal polling is both campaigns had Clinton winning by a small margin on election day, and both campaigns were expecting Clinton to win the electoral votes and Trump to win the popular vote.

I am kinda disappoint in the whole thing, mainly because America keeps nominating shitty candidates in the primaries and complaining about the shitty candidates on the ballot in the general. People should be voting for candidates they want to vote for instead of voting against their opponents out of fear.

I+ve+seen+this+somewhere+before+it+s+the+gallon+milk+smash+_377c26acb779cd99fcc17bac276aa390.gif
 
holyearth said:
The specifics of his tax plan remain to be seen. He has only specifically mentioned cutting the corporate tax rate which has 2 problems. 1) Nonpartisan govt. budget review indicates will raise the deficit (= we can't afford it)
Click to expand...

after a $10 trillion/50% increase in the national debt over the past 8 years, now you suddenly get concerned about the deficit?

you're a typical lefty political douchebag. go fuck yourself.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom