Martin Grunin - Facebook Ads Fraud - Bank Fraud - mgrunin

Status
Not open for further replies.


The images in this entire thread sure paint an interesting story lol

121e69w.jpg




2la6lnn.jpg
 
LOL #6 he should have posted a link to this thread and said he thought BRC was OK till he went to Wickedfire.
 
Finally...

Pro Prediction: The Order WILL be set aside, Grunin will get another shot at defending this and a new hearing date set, probably a few months out while his actual counsel sifts through the paperwork and starts putting an actual legal defense together.
 
Here's the thing and there's no way to get around it: when you read his posts on his website and even the ones I've seen here, he seems pretty normal. Then when you read the shit that he approved for his defense: I mean it is Unbelievable - in the truest sense of that word, literally Not to be believed. So it is those two diametrically opposed personas that I simply can not wrap my head around... it just does Not Compute Will Robinson.

Innocent until proven guilty is a cornerstone of this Great Nation's legal system. I believe in that concept because the alternative is too grim to fathom. Ok: so say that I'm the judge on this case and you as his attorney showed me his posts and then I had to somehow come to terms with their rationality versus his fuckin crazy legal filings... Now If you, as his attorney, said to me: "your honor my client has been taken over by space aliens from the planet Galaupko who are at times using his brain for shenanigans simply because they think it's funny. Your honor, just look carefully at the evidence with an open mind. We ask that this case be dismissed." As the judge I'd have to dismiss this case on the grounds of reasonable doubt.

I mean what other scenario makes any More fuckin sense here????
 
...on the grounds of reasonable doubt...

Except in civil matters the legal burden of proof required is only generally preponderance of evidence. Which means the evidence only has to show that allegations are likely to be true. Not provable beyond reasonable doubt. That is only for criminal charges. And even then that is only for those who don't plea bargain.

Indictments are handed out with only the burden of preponderance of evidence. At that point, for 97% of people a plea bargain is the only real choice. So yeah, the criminal 'justice' system you seem to believe in... for 3% of the population that get indicted. Note: This is not to defend martin, but more aimed at those who believe in the rhetoric of 'Innocent until proven guilty is a cornerstone of this Great Nation's legal system'... that shit is as diluted as Robert Costello, but not so evident. And no, I'm not an anarchist. I see no solutions to anything.
 
Here is all 13 pgs of the latest filing.

More lulz...

While Grunin did not file a response with the Court in time, Grunin's conduct was excusable because he believed that he engaged a licensed representative before this Court and followed requisite legal procedure.

Grunin had no intent to gain an advantage over the opposing party or to delay legal proceedings.

As such, Grunin's delay in response was due to excusable neglect.

All of Facebook's claims rely on the notion that Grunin, the individual they have sued, has wronged them in some way; however Facebook has failed to prove, or even allege, that Grunin is in fact the "Martin Grunin" with a Facebook account they seek.

zlIbEeB.jpg
 
Except in civil matters the legal burden of proof required is only generally preponderance of evidence. Which means the evidence only has to show that allegations are likely to be true. Not provable beyond reasonable doubt. That is only for criminal charges. And even then that is only for those who don't plea bargain.

Indictments are handed out with only the burden of preponderance of evidence. At that point, for 97% of people a plea bargain is the only real choice. So yeah, the criminal 'justice' system you seem to believe in... for 3% of the population that get indicted. Note: This is not to defend martin, but more aimed at those who believe in the rhetoric of 'Innocent until proven guilty is a cornerstone of this Great Nation's legal system'... that shit is as diluted as Robert Costello, but not so evident. And no, I'm not an anarchist. I see no solutions to anything.

But braugh it was you know... tongue in cheek. Like you know - a joke.
 
While Grunin did not file a response with the Court in time, Grunin's conduct was excusable because he believed that he engaged a licensed representative before this Court and followed requisite legal procedure.

Damn.

Did I call it or did I call it?

::emp::
 
Believable except when you consider that Grunin signed the bologna filled papers himself. Each and every document contains his signature and it's notarized. That means that legal education or not he had to have known that BRC was not a licensed attorney and the positions he took were out of this world.
 
I think Martin just has a very dim view of Facebook after, allegedly, being able to scam them for $300k(?) with just a few emails and a lil social engineering. So, he rolled the dice on Costello because he has a gambling addiction.

I was trying to find what Brian Costello ranks for in Google, like, was he searching, "How to make a lawsuit go away." Or something? Because that's what it seems like.
 
"Three claims of fraud against Grunin" omfg.

They have the IP addresses on the ad buys; the email addy subpoenas, the fax transmittals, etc. He used his Brooklyn address when he signed for a mail drop, as well as simply using his home address for much of it. This kid is def looking at jail time when the indictment rolls down. The wire transfers as well.
 
"Three claims of fraud against Grunin" omfg.

They have the IP addresses on the ad buys; the email addy subpoenas, the fax transmittals, etc. He used his Brooklyn address when he signed for a mail drop. This kid is def looking at jail time when the indictment rolls down. The wire transfers as well.

You sir are my favorite WF member! Straight to the point, no nonsense, no fucking around!

sagan-you-are-awesome-gif.gif
 
Believable except when you consider that Grunin signed the bologna filled papers himself. Each and every document contains his signature and it's notarized. That means that legal education or not he had to have known that BRC was not a licensed attorney and the positions he took were out of this world.

Didn't Gru sign a POA?

I doubt they will lift the judgement. You hire an ex-con, knowing he's an ex-con... it's the only shot his (real) attorney has at lifting the order of default. In reality, it's pointless. Measure the cost of the attorney(s) against the likely amount the judgment will be reduced. He can't avoid paying the attorneys...

He's sold some stuff, but they will come after the remaining car title, as well as the BS he tried to pull by selling one car to a buddy for song. They have all of his wires.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.