Check this out - Dumbass with an IDEA



You've got live... msn... <-- made me lol.

Edit: some great MLM keywords:

create incredible wealth
help create your success
not only did he get excited
it was the biggest thing he'd ever seen <--- so did your mom
he dropped everything he was doing, and got involved
committed to your success
 
Come join us in Las Vegas, Nevada at the Encore Hotel recently opened by the legendary Steve Wynn. The iJango launch event will begin at 2pm followed by a meet & greet hour at 3pm. Seating is limited to the first 1,000 registrants. You will witness the biggest annoucement in the history of network marketing.

:Yahoo_29:
 
Brain damage survivor!!

Hey, cut the guy some slack. He obviously went into a coma in the late 1980's when he was a little kid and just woke up a couple of months ago.

I'd say he's doing just fine!! lulz
 
Hey Cameron Barrett Sharp, Everyone on this thread is now dumber for having viewed that video. I award you no points... and may God have mercy on your soul.
 
Did anyone Google his name? Interesting results.
Oh man, that video + http://www.txnb.uscourts.gov/opinions/pdf/2006-3208-27.pdf was just too much. Comedy at its greatest. I love how this [alleged] scammer has an empty blog post titled "my side of the story".


Cameron Barrett Sharpe really needs some better SEO for his name, though, since most of the current listings are basically the same post. Between the video and the court case, he seems like a classic case of a [alleged] sociopath.
 
I love the black and white...does that make him more trustworthy or what? If he can do that...what cant he do?

He's just priming the pump. His next MLM. He's going to multi-level colors. I'm not talking crayola either.
 
We're laughing now... just wait till this "guru" posts some shit on WaFo, pays a bunch of the other people with sycophants attached to their anus to sing his praises, and he'll fucking bank.

It happened with Arbitrage conspiracy, and it'll happen with this, because it's a workable business model over there.

One of these days, I'm going to take one of those mood stabilising meds that hides your conscience in a draw and then bolts it shut, like almost anything from Pfizer, hit those douches hard.
 

Excerpts:

The matter before the court is essentially a dispute between
two parties, former friends, regarding various loans in the
aggregate sum of $150,000 made by Ms. Baker to Mr. Sharpe in
2005.
Both parties, in fact, agreed that at one point
their relationship could be fairly characterized as that of “best
friends.”
Mr. Sharpe did testify on cross that, during the time frame in
question, he had had drug and alcohol abuse problems and that he
had not, as of the time of trial, been able to overcome such
problems.
In 2005, Mr. Sharpe and Ms. Baker were both involved in a
business known as UltimateMatch.com, which, Mr. Sharpe testified,
was a dating service/direct marketing enterprise in which
revenues were obtained both from customers who used the dating
service and through distributors who sold the business to other
customers and distributors. Mr. Sharpe likened the business
model of the company to that of Mary Kay, Inc.
There is some
dispute as to whether Mr. Sharpe ever owned any part of
UltimateMatch.com. Ms. Baker testified that Mr. Sharpe
represented to her that he owned 10% of UltimateMatch.com and
said that he would give to Ms. Baker 3% of the company. Mr.
Sharpe testified that such interest was a “speculative interest.”
The parties agree that Mr. Sharpe was fired from his
position with UltimateMatch.com, whatever that position may have
been, in September of 2005. Mr. Sharpe’s Schedule I reflects
that his occupation is that of “independent sales” and that he
was unemployed at the time of filing bankruptcy.
Ms. Baker asserts that all of this evidence aggregates to
show that Mr. Sharpe devised a scheme to portray himself as a
wealthy man in order to con her into loaning him monies he knew
he could not possibly repay. Ms. Baker represents that the
clothing, the lifestyle, and all the trappings were part and
parcel to Mr. Sharpe’s having obtained money from her by false
pretenses, false representations, or actual fraud.
This court must determine whether, based upon the foregoing
facts, the $150,000 debt owed by Mr. Sharpe to Ms. Baker is
nondischargeable pursuant to section 523(a)(2)(A) of the
Bankruptcy Code.
For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff’s $150,000 debt is
found to be dischargeable pursuant to section 523(a)(2)(A) and
523(a)(6) of the Bankruptcy Code.