Help me fight back!

nickthrolson

nickthrolson

Neck Beard
Oct 3, 2008
348
13
0
CA USA
nickthrolson.com
RFL FY12 CA Corona CA: Nicholas Throlson PhD - The American Cancer Society - 2012 Relay For Life of Corona CA

I know most of you will either dick roll this post or be like dam Nick Throlson is alive. if you want to help support this cause please donate before Friday! Thanks! I will be walking this Saturday will be posting on my blog so anyone who wants back link for supporting will get one on my blog post!

This year, over 1.4 million Americans will hear the words "You have cancer". I know too many people who are touched by cancer, and that is why I have joined the American Cancer Society on a mission to save lives and create a world with more birthdays by participating in the Relay For Life in my community.

At Relay For Life we celebrate loved ones who have won their battle against cancer, remember those who are no longer with us, and fight back against this disease that touches so many. I am determined to make a difference, and I hope you will join me. I will be walking on 5/19/12.

Please, support me in my efforts by visiting my personal web page and making a donation. Every dollar raised brings us one dollar closer to a cure, and to a world with more birthdays.

Thank you so much for your support. Together, we are saving lives!

 


Nick, do you want to see my penis bro? Everyone always turns me down and now that you're back I was hoping I would have a change of luck. If so, PM Grindstone on where I should send my penis pictures and I will promptly deliver.

Also, it's a nice thing you're doing here. GJ buddy. I'd donate but Penguin put a small kink in my bank account at the moment.

<3

P.S. I'm serious about the penis pics bro, I'm down to fucking party.
 
Sorry dude, but all my charity money goes to Kiva.

That, and I don't believe in donating towards cancer research. I believe a cure is already there, but not released because it's not a multi-billion dollar industry. Treatment is much more profitable than a cure.
 
  • Like
Reactions: p0ck3taces
Will never donate to the piece of shit we call the American Cancer Society. However, I will donate to any other legitimate charity of your choosing Nick.
 
Donating £200 ($320 ish) to Cancer care and support charity - Macmillan Cancer Support because of you Nick (plus the Government will use my taxes to give them a 25% bonus as well).

9cei.png


If you are British, make sure you always use that when giving to charity ^
 
Kiopa_Matt said:
That, and I don't believe in donating towards cancer research. I believe a cure is already there, but not released because it's not a multi-billion dollar industry. Treatment is much more profitable than a cure.
Click to expand...

A treatment that can properly cure cancer is going to make just as much money as today's ineffective treatments. People are still going to get cancer and then require treatment, cancer is never going to be eradicated from existence.

Instead of dying from an ineffective, expensive treatment they'll receive an expensive AND effective treatment. Heck maybe they'll live long enough to get cancer again, making big pharma even more money.
 
johnmatrix said:
A treatment that can properly cure cancer is going to make just as much money as today's ineffective treatments. People are still going to get cancer and then require treatment, cancer is never going to be eradicated from existence.

Instead of dying from an ineffective, expensive treatment they'll receive an expensive AND effective treatment. Heck maybe they'll live long enough to get cancer again, making big pharma even more money.
Click to expand...

So after billions upon billions of dollars sunk into cancer research, 100s of millions sunk into nanotechnology labs by universities around the world, and the list goes on... you believe the best still available is chemotherapy? Chemotherapy was developed over a 100 years ago, first started being used in the medical field in the 1940s, and became widespread in the 60s and 70s.

Now think, this was a time before we sent men into space, the PC wasn't even a thought let alone the internet, and nuclear weapons weren't even developed when they first started using it. And nowadays, my cell phone has more computing technology than NASA had during the first space flights.

I don't know. I'm no doctor or medical researcher, but considering the technological improvements in nearly every other aspect of our lives over the past 50 years, I have a hard time believing chemotherapy is still our best treatment for cancer.
 
Kiopa_Matt said:
So after billions upon billions of dollars sunk into cancer research, 100s of millions sunk into nanotechnology labs by universities around the world, and the list goes on... you believe the best still available is chemotherapy? Chemotherapy was developed over a 100 years ago, first started being used in the medical field in the 1940s, and became widespread in the 60s and 70s.

Now think, this was a time before we sent men into space, the PC wasn't even a thought let alone the internet, and nuclear weapons weren't even developed when they first started using it. And nowadays, my cell phone has more computing technology than NASA had during the first space flights.

I don't know. I'm no doctor or medical researcher, but considering the technological improvements in nearly every other aspect of our lives over the past 50 years, I have a hard time believing chemotherapy is still our best treatment for cancer.
Click to expand...

They wouldn't use it if it weren't effective. You're talking like there have been no advancements in chemotherapy in the last 100 years which is extremely far from the truth. The reason they use it is it works the best out of anything they've come up with yet.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom